A Limitations on complex angle of refractions

AI Thread Summary
Complex refraction angles do not have inherent limitations on their real or imaginary parts, as both can be positive or negative. The values depend on the specific context of the analysis being conducted. Understanding the application is crucial for interpreting these angles accurately. The discussion emphasizes the flexibility of complex numbers in this context. Overall, the real and imaginary parts can vary widely based on the situation at hand.
elad
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Does complex refraction angle have any limitation on its real or imaginary part?
Does one of these part have to be positive or negative only?

Thanks,
Elad
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hey @elad, I guess the real and imaginary parts can be anything, really. Some numbers can be positive, and some can be negative. It depends on what you're looking at. What’s the context for these angles?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top