Limiting and Excess Reagents: Fact or Fiction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ProblemSets
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concepts of limiting and excess reagents in chemical reactions. It confirms that the amount of product is determined by the limiting reagent and that some excess reagent remains after the reaction. A balanced equation is deemed necessary to accurately identify the limiting reagent, while the assertion that the reactant with the smallest mass is the limiting reagent is challenged due to the importance of molar mass. The example provided illustrates how to calculate moles and determine the limiting reagent using a balanced equation. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate chemical analysis and reaction predictions.
ProblemSets
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Which of the following is NOT true about limiting and excess reagents?

a.)The amount of product obtained is determined by the limiting reagent.
b.)Some of the excess reagent is left over after the reaction is complete.
c.)A balanced equation is necessary to determine which reactant is the limiting reagent.
d.)The reactant that has the smallest given mass is the limiting reagent



I know that A is true and that B is true for sure. I am not sure about C. To me it seems that I always balance an equation, but maybe that is unneccesary work. My guess though is that because of molar mass, D is not true.

Am i correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would molar mass make D untrue?
 
well yes molar mass is important.

example:

if you have 40 grams of hydrogen gas and 50 grams of oxygen gas and you're making water, the balanced equation is 2H2 + O2 -> 2H2O . to find limiting reagent, you need to compare the ratio of the moles you HAVE of reactants to the ratio of moles you NEED to react as far as possible. so to get moles you use molar mass and end up with approximately 20 mol of H2 and 1.6 mol of O2.

you answer's in these questions:
-which will run out first?
-does the fact that there's a total smaller mass of hydrogen gas than oxygen gas?
-did your equation need to be balanced to find the ratio?
 
I was kinda hoping that Problemsets would answer that one...
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top