Limits (another error in the question?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yann
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Limits
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around limits in multivariable calculus, specifically evaluating limits as (x,y) approaches (0,0) for various functions. The original poster presents three parts of a problem, including proving the existence of certain limits and discussing the uniqueness of limits in the context of multivariable functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different paths to evaluate the limits, questioning the sufficiency of the original poster's reasoning. There is discussion about the uniqueness of limits and the implications of having different limits along different paths.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning the assumptions made in the original post. Some participants suggest that the limit in part b) is poorly stated and clarify that it refers to the uniqueness of limits along any path. There is a recognition that the limit in part c) does not exist due to differing results along different paths.

Contextual Notes

There are indications that the original poster may not have considered all paths approaching (0,0), and some participants suggest using polar coordinates to analyze the limits more thoroughly. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity in the definitions and statements regarding limits in multivariable contexts.

Yann
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a) Prove that;

[tex]\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow(0,0)} \frac{x^2y}{x^2+y^2} = 0[/tex]

b) Prove that if [tex]\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow(0,0)} f(x,y) = L_1[/tex] and [tex]\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow(0,0)} f(x,y) = L_2[/tex], then [tex]L_1=L_2[/tex]

c) Using the statement proven in 5b, prove that

[tex]\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow(0,0)} \frac{xy}{x^2+y^2}[/tex]

Does NOT exist.

2. The attempt at a solution

a)

[tex]f(0,y) = \frac{0}{y^2} = 0[/tex]

[tex]f(x,0) = \frac{0}{x^2} = 0[/tex]

From those 2 directions, the limit is the same, so;

[tex]\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow(0,0)} \frac{x^2y}{x^2+y^2} = 0[/tex]

b)

I have no idea how to do that, it seems to evident !

c)

Does NOT exist ? But...

[tex]f(0,y) = \frac{0}{y^2} = 0[/tex]

[tex]f(x,0) = \frac{0}{x^2} = 0[/tex]

It's exactly the same thing as in a), the limit DOES exist and it is;

[tex]\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow(0,0)} \frac{xy}{x^2+y^2} = 0[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ahh for b), seeing as they are the same limit, they must evaluate to the same thing. L1=L2
 
ops, I got it wrong. The limit in c doesn't exist because at (x,mx);

[tex]\lim_{(x,y)\rightarrow(0,0)} \frac{mx^2}{x^2(1+m)} = \frac{m}{m+1}[/tex]

However, this leads me to 2 questions;

I just proved the limit in c doesn't exist, why on Earth would I need, or even, how could I use the statement in b ?

Also, is my "proof" that the limit in a equal 0 sufficient ? Even at (x,mx) the limit is still 0, but still, is this a proof that the limit is 0 ?
 
Last edited:
The logic in problem c) is that since you have two different limits you contradicted b) so that the limit does not exist.

b) is just saying that if the (some) limit exists, then it is unique. Part b) can be resolved by general limit arguments, not talking just about function of two variables x,y.
 
You answer to a) does not account for (x,y) approaching (0,0) in any arbitrary path. What happens as the distance r from (0,0) goes to zero? (Hint: remember polar coords?)
 
I think (b) is badly stated. I would interpret what they say as "the limit is unique". That's easy to prove. Suppose there existed two different limits, L1, L2. Take [itex]\epsilon= |L_1- L_2|/2[/itex]. Show that no [itex]\delta[/itex] makes both [itex]|f(x)- L_1|< \epsilon[/itex] and [itex]|f(x)- L_2|< \epsilon[/itex] for (x,y) such that [itex]\sqrt{(x^2+ y^2}< \delta[/itex].

However, that's clearly not what's meant. What they mean is that if the limit itself exists, then the limits along any path must be the same. Unfortunately, the way it is stated implies that the "limit" means the limit "along some path" which is not true.


As gammamcc said, showing that the limit along two different paths gives the same thing does not prove that the limit exists. you must show that f(x,y) is close to some L as long as (x,y) is close to (0,0). Again, as gammamcc said, consider changing to polar coordinates. That way r itself measures the distance from (0,0). If the limit, as r goes to 0, does not depend upon [itex]\theta[/itex], then the limit exists.
 
Great, thank you both, I have my answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K