Limits, geometric series, cauchy, proof HELP

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework assignment related to geometric series, specifically focusing on the convergence of series using the Cauchy Convergence Criterion. The original poster presents several questions regarding the formulation of the n-th partial sum, conditions for convergence, and expressing a repeating decimal as a geometric series.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify the formula for the n-th partial sum of a geometric series and questions the implications of summing from 0 to infinity.
  • Participants discuss the application of the Cauchy Convergence Criterion and express confusion about its definition and application.
  • Some participants suggest that the original poster needs to clarify the specific results they are expected to prove and the relevance of the repeating decimal in the context of the assignment.
  • There are inquiries about how to prove convergence and the proper use of the Cauchy criterion in relation to the problems presented.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on the need to establish a formula for the n-th partial sum and the importance of understanding the Cauchy criterion. There is a recognition that the original poster may need to focus on the definitions and initial steps before proceeding further.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the assignment requires the use of the Cauchy criterion for proofs, and there is uncertainty about how the repeating decimal should be integrated into the various parts of the assignment. Some participants highlight that the first question may not directly involve convergence, which adds to the confusion.

  • #91
so do they want something like this? If I'm not using the .7171717, what will the beginning of my proof look like? Will be it to prove (a-ar^n+1)/(1-r) converges to a/(1-r)?

o781gw.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
Do you remember that when you started this thread, you insisted that you would have to use the Cauchy criterion? We haven't had any use for it in I(a), II(a) or II(b), so if you were right from the start, then we have to use it now. I told you what it means to use the Cauchy criterion, and how you should start, in post #64:

Fredrik said:
Definition: A series is convergent if and only if its sequence of partial sums is convergent. If the sequence is convergent, its limit is called the sum of the series.
Theorem: A series with real terms is convergent if and only if its sequence of partial sums is a Cauchy sequence.

You need to use this theorem to prove that your series is convergent. So the first thing you should write down is exactly what it means for your sequence of partial sums to be a Cauchy sequence.
Since then, I have told you at least twice that you need to read this and do what I'm saying at the end. I guess you're disappointed that no one else showed up, but if someone had, I would have wanted them to tell you nothing until after you have done this first step. They would have been wrong to do anything else.

Note that I told you that this is what it means to use the Cauchy criterion in post #5, 32 hours ago. I said "I assume", but you yourself confirmed that I was right in #6, half an hour later. Posts #9 (by micromass) and #25 (by me) also told you that I(b) is where you have to use the Cauchy criterion. #64 just spelled it out in as much detail as possible without violating forum rules.

One thing I didn't see from the start (this is the sort of thing you don't see until you actually start working on the problem) is that your teacher isn't just forcing you to use the Cauchy criterion so that you will have to learn it. He's doing it because if you just prove that \sum_{k=0}^\infty ar^k=\frac{a}{1-r} when |r|<1, you don't know if the series fails to converge for other values of r, or if the value of a is relevant when |r|≥1.

If you start by writing down what it means for the sequence of partial sums to be a Cauchy sequence, the rest is fairly straightforward. Keep in mind that a sequence of real numbers is convergent if and only if it's a Cauchy sequence. That's all I can tell you until you have actually done that first step.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K