MHB Limits of Rational Functions: Dividing by Highest Power?

AI Thread Summary
When evaluating limits of rational functions as x approaches infinity, dividing each term by the highest power of x helps simplify the expression. It is generally effective to divide by the highest power found in the denominator. This method is particularly useful when direct substitution leads to an indeterminate form, such as infinity over infinity. Different approaches like factoring or rationalizing may yield the same limit, but can be less efficient in certain cases. Ultimately, using the highest power method consistently leads to accurate results in these scenarios.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello all

I have a general question. When I look for a limit of a rational function, there is this rule of dividing each term by the highest power.

I wanted to ask if I should divide by the highest power, or the highest power in the denominator, and why ?

I have seen different answers in different sources and I can't understand the difference between these methods, any example I tried looking at gave an identical solution no matter how I solved it.

Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Mr Yankel

I hope that I understand your question properly ,,

The idea of evaluating rational polynomial functions where x approaches infinity is to eliminate variable (x) from either denominator or numerator ..

The rule of dividing each term by the highest power for a function of form (polynomial /polynomial) is an alternative way and it is useful when factoring and rationalizing is too hard or inefficient! . However , these all ways lead to the same answer where they can be applied.
Nevertheless ,In some functions , One or two of these three ways seem to be useless .

consider the following limits

$$\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{x^3 +x^2 +1}{x^2+x}$$

$$\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{x-1}{x^2-1}$$

$$\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{x^3 +x^2 -1}{x^2+x}$$

If you substitute directly x by infinity in these limits you would get infinity over infinity which is indeterminate value.

Actually the first limit can be evaluated by rationalizing "since factoring is quite hard" ,, you would get:

$$x + \frac{1}{x^2+x}$$

From the fact that $$\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{n}{x}=\infty$$
and $$\lim_{x\to \infty}\frac{n}{x}=0$$

Then by substituting you would get infinity plus 0 which is infinity.
Also you can use the idea of dividing by the highest power to get the same answer.

The second one you can factor it , it will be :

$$\frac{1}{x+1}$$ the limit would be 0 then.
Also you can use the idea of dividing by the highest power to get the same answer


The third one you cannot use either factoring nor rationalizing , you would get indeterminate value , you can only use the idea of highest power !

Our limit would be :

$$\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{\frac{x^3}{x^3} +\frac{x^2}{x^3} -\frac{1}{x^3}}{\frac{x^2}{x^3}+\frac{x}{x^3}}$$

then

$$\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{1 +\frac{1}{x} -\frac{1}{x^3}}{\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{x}}$$

which leads to

$$\frac{1}{0} = \infty$$

I hope that I have answered your question :)
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top