Lin. Algebra - Sum of Dim. of Three Subspaces

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a linear algebra problem concerning the dimensions of the sum of three subspaces within a finite-dimensional vector space. The original poster is tasked with proving a specific formula relating the dimensions of these subspaces and their intersections or providing a counterexample if the statement is false.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses uncertainty about the validity of the formula and considers the implications of needing to provide a counterexample. They reference a known formula for the sum of two subspaces and question whether the same reasoning applies here.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the validity of the formula, suggesting it parallels the formula for sets and encouraging the original poster to proceed with their proof. However, there is no explicit consensus on the necessity of a counterexample, and the original poster remains uncertain about the earlier discussions on the topic.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions a concern regarding the requirement to provide a counterexample, indicating a potential lack of confidence in the formula's truth. There is also a reference to previous similar questions, suggesting that this topic may be under active discussion in the forum.

steelphantom
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
Another linear algebra question! What a surprise! :rolleyes:

Homework Statement


If U1, U2, U3, are subspaces of a finite-dimensional vector space, then show

dim(U1 + U2 + U3) = dimU1 + dimU2 + dimU3 - dim(U1 \cap U2) - dim(U1 \cap U3) - dim(U2 \cap U3) + dim(U1 \cap U2 \cap U3)

or give a counterexample.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I have the proof of the sum of the dimension of two subspaces in my book, so I would assume I would proceed in much the same way, but that "or give a counterexample" is making me just a little bit uneasy. I'm 90% sure that this is true, because basically the same formula holds for sets. Could anyone tell me if this is true before I proceed with my proof? It's going to be a long one if I use the same method the book did.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This has been asked more than once today, and I'll give you the same answer others have given. It is the same formula as for sets. And for the same reasons if you pick a compatible basis for the vector space. Proceed with your proof.
 
Dick said:
This has been asked more than once today, and I'll give you the same answer others have given. It is the same formula as for sets. And for the same reasons if you pick a compatible basis for the vector space. Proceed with your proof.

Thanks for the response. I finished my proof, but where was this question asked earlier today? I didn't see it in the Homework Help or Linear Algebra forums.
 
steelphantom said:
Thanks for the response. I finished my proof, but where was this question asked earlier today? I didn't see it in the Homework Help or Linear Algebra forums.

Hmmm. Now I can't find it. It may be under an obscure title. BTW, I didn't mean to say that you should have searched for other posts before asking. I was only saying my response wasn't original.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K