Line integral and vector fields

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the evaluation of the line integral of the vector field \(\mathop F\limits^ \to = (yz^p, x^p z, xy^p)\) and determining the value of \(p\) for which the integral equals zero over a closed path \(C_2\). The correct approach involves calculating the curl of the vector field, which is given by \(\nabla \times \mathop F\limits^ \to\). The consensus is that \(p = 1\) is the solution, but there was confusion regarding the application of the power rule in differentiation. The participants clarified that the problem should be interpreted in \(\mathbb{R}^3\) rather than \(\mathbb{R}^2\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields and line integrals
  • Familiarity with the curl operator in vector calculus
  • Knowledge of Green's theorem and its applications
  • Proficiency in differentiation, particularly the power rule
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of curl and its implications in vector fields
  • Learn about Green's theorem and its applications in line integrals
  • Review the power rule in calculus to avoid common differentiation errors
  • Explore examples of line integrals in three-dimensional vector fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying vector calculus, as well as educators looking for clarification on line integrals and vector field analysis.

Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm having trouble with the following question.

Q. Let p be a real constant and [itex]\mathop F\limits^ \to = \left( {yz^p ,x^p z,xy^p } \right)[/itex] be a vector field. For what value of p is the line integral

[tex]\int\limits_{C_2 }^{} {\mathop F\limits^ \to \bullet d\mathop s\limits^ \to } = 0[/tex]

Where C_2 is any closed path in R^2.

Firstly, how can C_2 be a path in R^2 when the vector field is '3D'? That doesn't seem to make sense in the context of the line integral. Assuming that C_2 is any closed path in R^3 then it should be sufficient to find the values of p so that curl F = 0.

I found [itex]curl\mathop F\limits^ \to = \nabla \times \mathop F\limits^ \to[/itex]

[tex] = \left( {x\left( {p - 1} \right)y^{p - 1} - x^p ,y\left( {p - 1} \right)z^{p - 1} - y^p ,z\left( {p - 1} \right)x^{p - 1} - z^p } \right)[/tex]

The answer is p = 1 but substituting p = 1 to what I found doesn't give the result curl F = 0. I've checked over my calculation a few times but I still can't see what's wrong with the curlf that I've computed. Can someone help me out?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right. It doesn't make sense to define a vector field in R3 and then ask you to integrate it around a curve in R2!

There are two things you could do- you assume they mean a path in the xy- plane, z= 0. Of course, that makes the problem trivial- I'm sure that is not what was intended. I would assume that R2 was just a typo- that it should be R3.

You have [tex]= \left( {x\left( {p - 1} \right)y^{p - 1} - x^p ,y\left( {p - 1} \right)z^{p - 1} - y^p ,z\left( {p - 1} \right)x^{p - 1} - z^p } \right)[/tex]

Good grief! You've correctly analyzed a problem in Green's theorem and messed up the "power law"?? The derivative of xn is nxn-1, not (n-1)xn-1 as you have!
 
Heh, I don't know how I managed to miss my error with the power rule. Thanks for the help HallsofIvy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K