Line integral with respect to arc length

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the concept of line integrals with respect to arc length, specifically the notation f(x, y)ds within the integral. It clarifies that x and y are functions of the arc length parameter s, which can also be expressed in terms of another parameter t. The relationship ds² = dx² + dy² is confirmed as a fundamental aspect of this topic. The participants conclude that while s is an increasing function of t, the inverse relationship t = t(s) is essential for understanding the parameterization of the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of line integrals
  • Familiarity with arc length parameterization
  • Knowledge of inverse functions
  • Basic calculus concepts, including derivatives and integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of line integrals in multivariable calculus
  • Explore parameterization techniques in calculus
  • Learn about the relationship between arc length and parametric equations
  • Investigate the application of inverse functions in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus, multivariable functions, and line integrals. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of arc length and its applications in integrals.

Castilla
Messages
241
Reaction score
0
In a line integral with respect to arc length, we have something like f(x, y)ds "inside" the integral sign.

The ds tells us that we are working with the arc length function s, taking diferences (s_K+1 - s_k) in the sums that tend to the line integral.

Question: do we shall understand that x = x(s), y = y(s), or x and y are functions of another parameter? In this last case, this means that we work with two different parameters in the sums that tend to the integral?

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ultimately x and y must be functions of s, although they be expressed in terms of another parameter.
Specifically ds2 = dx2 + dy2.
 
I think I have understood.

s = s(t), but s is an increasing function, so we have its inverse t = t(s). Then
x = x(t) = x(t(s)), y = y(t) = y(t(s)). Is this ok?
 
If t is an arbitrary parameter, it does not necessarily follow that s is an increasing function of t.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K