Linear Algebra: 2 eigenfunctions, one with eigenvalue zero

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of eigenfunctions in linear algebra, specifically concerning two eigenfunctions of an operator where one has an eigenvalue of zero. The original poster questions whether the second function must also be an eigenfunction based on the given conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of having one eigenfunction with an eigenvalue of zero and question whether this guarantees that another function is also an eigenfunction. There is discussion about the conditions under which a linear combination of eigenfunctions remains an eigenfunction.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions. Some participants express confusion about the definitions and relationships between the eigenfunctions and their eigenvalues, while others clarify the conditions necessary for a linear combination to be an eigenfunction.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential misunderstandings regarding the definitions of eigenfunctions and eigenvalues, as well as the implications of having an eigenvalue of zero. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and clarifications without reaching a definitive conclusion.

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



If I have two eigenfunctions of some operator, that are linearly indepdendent e.g ##F(x) , G(x)+16F(x) ## and ##F(x)## has eigenvalue ##0##, does this mean that ## G(x) ## must itself be an eigenfunction?

I thought for sure yes, but the way I particular question I just worked through went seemed to suggest it shouldn't be obvious, so perhaps not always guaranteed too.

Homework Equations



So I have ## \hat{P} F(x) = 0 F(x) ##
##\hat{P}G(x)=16F(x)+G(x)##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
##=> \hat{P}(16F(x)+G(x))= \hat{P}(16F(x))+\hat{P}(G(x))=0+\hat{P}(16F(x)+G(x))## therefore ##16F(x)+G(x)## is an eigenfunction with eigenvalue ##1##

Intuition says ##G(x)## should be an eigenfunction, I can't think how to show it from the above however.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A linear combination of eigenfunctions is generally not an eigenfunction. It is only an eigenfunction if the eigenvalues are the same.
 
Perhaps you drank too much vodka... but P(16F(x)+G(x))= itself is not the definition of an eigenvalue equation.
 
Orodruin said:
A linear combination of eigenfunctions is generally not an eigenfunction. It is only an eigenfunction if the eigenvalues are the same.
Totally agree, didn't say that.
I thought if one has eigenvalue zero it may be a special case.
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
Perhaps you drank too much vodka... but P(16F(x)+G(x))= itself is not the definition of an eigenvalue equation.
Not this time my friend, unfortunately.

Typo =..0× F(x) + P(G(x))= 16F(x) + G(x)
 
binbagsss said:

Homework Statement



If I have two eigenfunctions of some operator, that are linearly indepdendent e.g ##F(x) , G(x)+16F(x) ## and ##F(x)## has eigenvalue ##0##, does this mean that ## G(x) ## must itself be an eigenfunction?

I thought for sure yes, but the way I particular question I just worked through went seemed to suggest it shouldn't be obvious, so perhaps not always guaranteed too.

Homework Equations



So I have ## \hat{P} F(x) = 0 F(x) ##
##\hat{P}G(x)=16F(x)+G(x)##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
##=> \hat{P}(16F(x)+G(x))= \hat{P}(16F(x))+\hat{P}(G(x))=0+\hat{P}(16F(x)+G(x))## therefore ##16F(x)+G(x)## is an eigenfunction with eigenvalue ##1##

Intuition says ##G(x)## should be an eigenfunction, I can't think how to show it from the above however.
Thanks

You've lost me here. In general, if ##F## and ##G## are eigenfunctions, then ##F+G## is an eigenfunction iff ##F## and ##G## have the same eigenvalue:

##\hat{P}(F + G) = \lambda F + \mu G = \lambda (F+G) + (\mu - \lambda) G##

Which is just what @Orodruin said in post #2.
 
binbagsss said:
Totally agree, didn't say that.
I thought if one has eigenvalue zero it may be a special case.
Why would it be a special case? There is no reason for that. As has already been said, the only relevant information is if the eigenvalues are the same.
 
PeroK said:
You've lost me here. In general, if ##F## and ##G## are eigenfunctions, then ##F+G## is an eigenfunction iff ##F## and ##G## have the same eigenvalue:

##\hat{P}(F + G) = \lambda F + \mu G = \lambda (F+G) + (\mu - \lambda) G##

Which is just what @Orodruin said in post #2.
I am doing the opposite of this.
I have that f and 16f +g are both eigenfunctions . F has eigenvalue 0.
 
binbagsss said:
I am doing the opposite of this.
I have that f and 16f +g are both eigenfunctions . F has eigenvalue 0.
No, you are really not doing the opposite. Let h = 16f + g and then what you are asking is if g = h - 16 f is an eigenvector if h and f are eigenvectors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #10
binbagsss said:
I am doing the opposite of this.
I have that f and 16f +g are both eigenfunctions . F has eigenvalue 0.

You assumed that ##F## and ##16F + G## were eigenfunctions and asked if ##G## was also an eigenfunction. As ##F## is an eigenfunction, so is ##-16F##, with the same eigenvalue as ##F##. Hence, ##G = -16F + (16F + G)## is an eigenfunction iff ##-16F## and ##16F + G## have the same eigenvalue, i.e. iff ##F## and ##16F + G## have the same eigenvalue.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K