Linear algebra proof definition of a stochastic matrix

Click For Summary
A stochastic matrix is defined as having entries between 0 and 1, with each column summing to 1, although it can also have negative entries. The discussion highlights that every stochastic matrix has an eigenvalue of 1, and at least one eigenvector corresponding to this eigenvalue has all entries of the same sign. The transformation of probability vectors by stochastic matrices keeps them on the probability vector plane, leading to the conclusion that eigenvalues must be less than or equal to 1 to prevent divergence. Several approaches to proving these properties are suggested, including using the Jordan canonical form and examining the iterates of a probability vector. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clearer proof and references advanced texts for further details on steady state vectors.
0rthodontist
Science Advisor
Messages
1,229
Reaction score
0
I was reading through the section of my linear algebra book that deals with Markov chains. It said that in a stochastic matrix A, there is always a probability vector v such that Av = v.

I didn't see a precise definition of a stochastic matrix, but I gather it means that every entry is between 0 and 1 inclusive, and each column sums to 1. And apparently a probability vector is just a stochastic matrix of width 1.

The book declined to prove it, and I am not finding it easy to do so. It means that all stochastic matrices have 1 as an eigenvalue, and also that the entries in at least one eigenvector for that eigenvalue all have the same sign.

I'm thinking, stochastic matrices transform probability vectors into other probability vectors, so if you start with a probability vector v = (v1, ... , vn) and keep transforming it it always stays on the probability vector plane v1 + ... + vn = 1, in the first quadrant/octant/etc. If the stochastic matrix has n linearly independent eigenvectors, then it's simple: just write v as a linear combination of eigenvectors. If any eigenvalues for these eigenvectors are greater than 1 then v eventually goes to infinity under repeated transformations by A, so all eigenvalues are <= 1. There must be an eigenvalue that is 1, because otherwise v would eventually go to 0. And the eigenvalues less than 1 drop away, so the conclusion follows. However, is it true that a stochastic matrix will always have n l.i. eigenvectors?

Also is there a simpler way to prove it, maybe by starting with det (A - I) = 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hrm.


First off, a stochastic matrix can have negative entries. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_matrix


I can see a few approaches that might work.

You could try and do something with the Jordan canonical form.

You could try to write A as a limit of diagonalizable stochastic matrices, and do something with that.

You could try proving the theorem directly by chasing around the iterates of some v, or by looking at the set of limit points of the sequence A^n v. (Armed, of course, with the knowledge that all of the iterates are probability vectors)
 
Last edited:
The book actually gave it as a problem with hints at the end of the section, though it's odd they didn't mention that in the text where I first came across it. Anyway, the trick they used is in the matrix A - I, add to the last row all the rows above it. Since each column of A - I sums to 0, the last row will then be 0.

They said that the part about the steady state vector v = Av having positive entries is given in advanced texts.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K