Linear Algebra Standard Matrix

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the standard matrix for a linear transformation T defined by the projection of a vector in \(\mathbb{R}^2\) onto a given non-zero vector \(\vec{u}\). The specific vector provided is \(\vec{u} = [1, -1]\).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to determine the images of the standard basis vectors \(\vec{e_1}\) and \(\vec{e_2}\) under the transformation T, using the projection formula. Some participants suggest that visualizing the transformation could aid understanding.

Discussion Status

Participants have acknowledged the correctness of the original poster's calculations, while also noting a minor error in the labeling of equations. The discussion appears to be constructive, with participants providing feedback and affirmations.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty regarding the concepts of matrix transformations, indicating a learning phase in their understanding of the topic.

Screwdriver
Messages
125
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let \vec{u}\neq 0 be a vector in \mathbb{R}^2 and let

T:\mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}^2 be described by

T:\vec{v} \to proj_{\vec{u}}(\vec{v})

If \vec{u}=[1,-1]

Find the standard matrix for T

Homework Equations



proj_{\vec{u}}(\vec{v})= \frac{\vec{v}\cdot\vec{u} }{\vec{u}\cdot\vec{u}}\vec{u}

The Attempt at a Solution



Determine where T sends \vec{e_1} and \vec{e_2}

f(\vec{e_1})= \frac{\vec{e_1}\cdot\vec{u} }{\vec{u}\cdot\vec{u}}\vec{u}

f(\vec{e_1})= \frac{[1,0]\cdot [1,-1]}{[1,-1]\cdot [1,-1]}

f(\vec{e_1})= [\frac{1}{2},-\frac{1}{2}]

f(\vec{e_2})= \frac{\vec{e_2}\cdot\vec{u} }{\vec{u}\cdot\vec{u}}\vec{u}

f(\vec{e_2})= \frac{[0,1]\cdot [1,-1]}{[1,-1]\cdot [1,-1]}

f(\vec{e_2})= [-\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}]

So does that mean that the standard matrix is

<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> \frac{1}{2} &amp; -\frac{1}{2} \\ <br /> -\frac{1}{2} &amp; \frac{1}{2} \\<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br />

?

[Edited twice for LaTex mistakes]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems correct!
 
This is correct, although your derivation in section 3 has a typo: the fourth through sixth equations should begin with f(\vec{e}_2) rather than f(\vec{e}_1).

It's easier to see where this operation should send the unit vectors by drawing a picture.
 
Pretty much okay I'd say.
 
Thank you, gentlemen. We just learned all this crazy stuff about matrix transformations and I'm still a little iffy on the concept :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K