Linear & Angular Velocity Related Rates

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a rotating beacon located 1 kilometer off a straight shoreline, with the goal of determining how fast the beam of light appears to be moving to a viewer positioned 1/2 kilometer down the shoreline. The beacon rotates at a rate of 3 revolutions per minute, and the context includes concepts of linear and angular velocity as well as related rates.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of angular velocity equations and differentiation with respect to time. There are attempts to relate revolutions to kilometers and questions about the necessary distances for conversions. Some participants express confusion about how to apply the given frequency of revolutions to find the desired speed in kilometers per hour.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations and approaches to the problem. Some have provided hints and guidance, while others are still questioning their understanding of the relationships between the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of missing information and assumptions under discussion, particularly regarding the relationship between revolutions and distance, as well as the necessity of certain distances in the calculations. Participants are also navigating the conversion of units from revolutions to kilometers per hour.

Michele Nunes
Messages
42
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A rotating beacon is located 1 kilometer off a straight shoreline (see figure). If the beacon rotates at a rate of 3 revolutions per minute, how fast (in kilometers per hour) does the beam of light appear to be moving to a viewer who is 1/2 kilometer down the shoreline?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay so I used the equation w = 2πf where w is the angular velocity and f is the frequency of rotation. I implicitly differentiated with respect to time, then plugged in 3 rev/min for df/dt, then converted to km/hr, and got 360π km/hr. The answer is 450π km/hr. I think my units are off somewhere or I'm using the wrong equation but I'm not sure.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8729.jpg
    IMG_8729.jpg
    48.4 KB · Views: 705
Physics news on Phys.org
Michele Nunes said:

Homework Statement


A rotating beacon is located 1 kilometer off a straight shoreline (see figure). If the beacon rotates at a rate of 3 revolutions per minute, how fast (in kilometers per hour) does the beam of light appear to be moving to a viewer who is 1/2 kilometer down the shoreline?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay so I used the equation w = 2πf where w is the angular velocity and f is the frequency of rotation. I implicitly differentiated with respect to time, then plugged in 3 rev/min for df/dt, then converted to km/hr, and got 360π km/hr. The answer is 450π km/hr. I think my units are off somewhere or I'm using the wrong equation but I'm not sure.

What was the distance you used in the conversion? Can you type out your work step by step?
 
Student100 said:
What was the distance you used in the conversion? Can you type out your work step by step?
d/dt[w] = d/dt[2πf]
dw/dt = 2π(df/dt)
dw/dt = 2π(3 rev/min) = 6π km/min = 360π km/hr
 
Michele Nunes said:
d/dt[w] = d/dt[2πf]
dw/dt = 2π(df/dt)
dw/dt = 2π(3 rev/min) = 6π km/min = 360π km/hr

What about the distance from the shore to the light house? How are you going from revs to km?
 
I honestly don't know how to relate the units of revolutions to kilometers, that's what I'm not understanding, like they give me the frequency of revolutions of the beacon but I don't know what to do with that to end up getting kilometers/hour.
 
Michele Nunes said:
I honestly don't know how to relate the units of revolutions to kilometers, that's what I'm not understanding, like they give me the frequency of revolutions of the beacon but I don't know what to do with that to end up getting kilometers/hour.

First use your trig relationship to find the distance from the observer on the shore to the beacon house.
 
Student100 said:
First use your trig relationship to find the distance from the observer on the shore to the beacon house.
Okay it's sqrt(5)/2 but what do I do with it? I've looked up angular velocity equations and they all have like 1 too many variables that I don't have enough information on.
 
Let the lighthouse be ##Q##, let ##P## be the point on the shore nearest the lighthouse, let ##x## be the distance from ##P## to where the spotlight hits the shore, and ##\theta## be the angle of rotation from ##QP##. What you need to calculate is ##\frac{dx}{dt}##. You don't need the distance from the observer on shore to the beacon house to work this problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Michele Nunes
LCKurtz said:
Let the lighthouse be ##Q##, let ##P## be the point on the shore nearest the lighthouse, let ##x## be the distance from ##P## to where the spotlight hits the shore, and ##\theta## be the angle of rotation from ##QP##. What you need to calculate is ##\frac{dx}{dt}##. You don't need the distance from the observer on shore to the beacon house to work this problem.
Okay I got it now, thank you!
 
  • #10
Michele Nunes said:
Okay I got it now, thank you!
If you don't mind, could you tell me how you ended up solving this problem? I was trying it myself but I'm not sure if I have the right equation to differentiate or if I'm using the rate of the rotating beacon light correctly.
 
  • #11
Thewindyfan said:
If you don't mind, could you tell me how you ended up solving this problem? I was trying it myself but I'm not sure if I have the right equation to differentiate or if I'm using the rate of the rotating beacon light correctly.

Show us what you did if you want advice or help.
 
  • #12
LCKurtz said:
Show us what you did if you want advice or help.
Okay so based off your guidance in the last post, I basically sorted out what was given and what we want. You mentioned that the hypotenuse or the length of the beam isn't necessary for this problem so I decided to use the equation tan(Θ) = (x)/1
From implicitly differentiating with respect to time, I got the equation sec^2(Θ)*dΘ/dt = dx/dt
Since we know that dr/dt(rate of change of revolution of beacon) = 3 revs/min, I used dimensional analysis to get that dΘ/dt at that moment is 6π rad/min, but then I realized I definitely went wrong somewhere with my related equation since I would still need to know the length of the beam of light and even when I did, I got a pretty small number. I'm stuck on exactly how you have to deal with the dr/dt and what the best equation to relate these rates would be for this specific problem.

Thanks in advance!
 
  • #13
Thewindyfan said:
From implicitly differentiating with respect to time, I got the equation sec^2(Θ)*dΘ/dt = dx/dt
Since we know that dr/dt(rate of change of revolution of beacon) = 3 revs/min, I used dimensional analysis to get that dΘ/dt at that moment is 6π rad/min
You are almost there.
Hint: ##1+\tan^²(\theta)=\sec²(\theta)##
 
  • #14
Thewindyfan said:
Okay so based off your guidance in the last post, I basically sorted out what was given and what we want. You mentioned that the hypotenuse or the length of the beam isn't necessary for this problem so I decided to use the equation tan(Θ) = (x)/1
From implicitly differentiating with respect to time, I got the equation sec^2(Θ)*dΘ/dt = dx/dt
Since we know that dr/dt(rate of change of revolution of beacon) = 3 revs/min,

That would be ##\frac{d\theta}{dt}##, and it is the rate of revolution, not the "rate of change" of it. And don't forget the final units requested in the problem are kilometers/hour for ##\frac{dx}{dt}##.

I used dimensional analysis to get that dΘ/dt at that moment is 6π rad/min, but then I realized I definitely went wrong somewhere with my related equation since I would still need to know the length of the beam of light and even when I did, I got a pretty small number. I'm stuck on exactly how you have to deal with the dr/dt and what the best equation to relate these rates would be for this specific problem.

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Samy_A said:
You are almost there.
Hint: ##1+\tan^²(\theta)=\sec²(\theta)##
Wow I can't believe I haven't thought of using this identity for these types of related rates problems! Thanks for the tip.

LCKurtz said:
That would be ##\frac{d\theta}{dt}##, and it is the rate of revolution, not the "rate of change" if it. And don't forget the final units requested in the problem are kilometers/hour for ##\frac{dx}{dt}##.

Ah so I just forgot to have ##\frac{d\theta}{dt}## in the proper units before plugging in the numbers into the differentiated equation! Thank you for pointing that out! I haven't seen a related rates problem like this so I guess I was overthinking about it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K