Linear Momentum Algebraic interpretation

AI Thread Summary
A light object and a heavy object can have the same kinetic energy, but their momenta differ due to their mass and velocity relationship. The discussion emphasizes using algebra to derive the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum, suggesting a different approach by expressing velocity in terms of momentum. The key relationship involves the ratio of kinetic energies being proportional to the squares of their momenta. This algebraic interpretation helps clarify that the heavier object will have greater momentum despite having the same kinetic energy as the lighter object. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
brycenrg
Messages
95
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A light object and a heavy object have the same kinetic energy. Which has more momentum?

Homework Equations


I am trying to prove this through algebra.
I don't understand how to show this any help?

The Attempt at a Solution


1/2m1v1^2 = 1/2m2v2^2 when m1 > m2

v1 = v2 squareroot(m2/m1)

m1v2 squareroot(m2/m1) = m2v1 squareroot(m1/m2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brycenrg said:

Homework Statement


A light object and a heavy object have the same kinetic energy. Which has more momentum?

Homework Equations


I am trying to prove this through algebra.
I don't understand how to show this any help?

The Attempt at a Solution


1/2m1v1^2 = 1/2m2v2^2 when m1 > m2

v1 = v2 squareroot(m2/m1)

m1v2 squareroot(m2/m1) = m2v1 squareroot(m1/m2)

I do not see what is the sense of your last line. What are the momenta?
 
I suggest you work in the other direction and do not use v as a variable. Instead, solve for v from p = mv and insert this into the expression for kinetic energy.
 
Here's a hint. You do have to use algebra here, but this is only a qualitative question where you have to find the relationship

## \frac{KE_1}{KE_2} = constant = \alpha(m_1, m_2) \frac{p_1^2}{p_2^2} ##

where ## \alpha ## is a function of the two masses. Once you find this relationship, you can answer the question easily.

Goodluck! ;)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top