Linear System Solution in Matrix Form

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a system of linear equations represented in matrix form. The original poster presents a system with two equations and five unknowns, exploring the relationships between the variables and their representations as vectors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of having more unknowns than equations, questioning how many variables can be determined. They explore the representation of solutions in vector form and consider the correctness of their solutions compared to those in a textbook.

Discussion Status

The discussion has evolved with participants providing guidance on verifying solutions through matrix multiplication. The original poster initially identifies an error in their solution but later corrects it, aligning with the textbook's answer. There is an acknowledgment of the existence of multiple solutions and the nature of the solution space.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the solution space is a three-dimensional subspace of R5, and there is a focus on the kernel or nullspace of the transformation represented by the matrix. The original poster's initial confusion about their solution indicates a learning process regarding linear combinations and vector spaces.

0kelvin
Messages
50
Reaction score
5
\begin{cases}
x+ 2y - z + w - t = 0 \\
x - y + z + 3w - 2t = 0
\end{cases}

Add 1st to the 2nd:

$$2x + y + w - t = 0 \\
y = -2x -w + t = 0$$

Substitute y in the 1st:

##x + 2x + w - t + 3w - 2t + z = 0 \\
z = 3x - 4w + 3t##

Both z and y in terms of x,w,t. Writing using matrix form:

##\left[\begin{matrix}
x \\
y \\
z \\
w \\
t \\
\end{matrix}\right] =
x\left[\begin{matrix}
1 \\
-2 \\
-3 \\
0 \\
0 \\
\end{matrix}\right] +
w\left[\begin{matrix}
0 \\
-1 \\
-4 \\
1 \\
0 \\
\end{matrix}\right] +
t\left[\begin{matrix}
0 \\
1 \\
3 \\
0 \\
1 \\
\end{matrix}\right]
##

Solution ##x(1,-2,-3,0,0) + w(0,-1,-4,1,0) + t(0,1,3,0,1)##. I can isolate any two variables, but I have no idea if different solutions are in fact, part of the same set of solutions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How many unknowns do you have? How many equations? What does that tell you about the solution?
 
Two equations of five unknowns, that means that up to two unknowns can be calculated, while the other three remain unknown.

the answer in the book is also a sum of three vectors, in terms of x,w and t. But my values aren't equal nor multiples.
 
Last edited:
0kelvin said:
Two equations of five unknowns, that means that up to two unknowns can be calculated, while the other three remain unknown.

the answer in the book is also a sum of three vectors, in terms of x,w and t. But my values aren't equal nor multiples.
You can check to see if your solution is actually a solution this way.
Write your system of equations in matrix form:
$$\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2 & -1 & 1 & -1 \\ 1 & -1 & 1 & 3 & -2\end{bmatrix}$$
Multiply each of your three vectors on the left by this matrix. If you get the zero vector for each multiplication, your vectors are correct.

You can check to see whether the vectors given as answers in your book are correct by doing the same thing.

I haven't checked your work, but from what you have, the solution space is a three-dimensional subspace of R5. Your vectors, if correct, are a basis for that subspace. It's possible that the vectors given in your textbook are also correct. If so, they just happen to be a different set of basis vectors.

BTW, I don't know if you're covered this yet, but the solution space you have found is called the kernel or nullspace of the tranformation represented by the matrix I showed. If we call this matrix A, the kernel is the set of vectors x such that Ax = 0.
 
My solution is wrong. The first vector multiplied by the matrix results in 0, but not the other two. The answer in the book is correct because all three vectors multiplied by the matrix result in 0.

There was a mistake in the first addition. Fixed it and now I've found the same answer as in the book. This means that there are other solutions, I can isolate any two variables and find different linear combinatinos of three vectors.
 
Last edited:
Well done.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K