Linearization of Non Linear Equation

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on linearizing the relationship between the mass and diameter of steel bearings, which shows an exponential increase in mass with diameter. To linearize the data, participants suggest using logarithmic transformations, specifically taking the log of mass or diameter, to achieve a straight-line graph. The importance of the slope of the linearized graph is highlighted, as it represents the relationship between the logarithmic values of mass and diameter. The mass of a sphere is related to its diameter through the formula involving density and volume, which can also be expressed in logarithmic form. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately interpreting the linearized data and its implications.
BlackJackal
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Ok so here is the problem:

You have six steel bearing varying in size and you have their mass and diameter. When you graph the data you see that the mass (in Grams) goes up exponentially as diameter (in cm) goes up. Below is the table of the Mass and Diameters

M=.44 D=.4
M=2.04 D=.8
M=8.35 D=1.2
M=21.73 D=1.7
M=28.35 D=1.9
M=80.06 D=2.7

Ok so now you are supposed to graph the data above, which I did, and then you need to linearize the data, describe the importance of the slope of the linearized graph, and express the liearization as a new function.

Before we go any further I know that what the linearized data is supposed to be, because the proffesor told me. However I don't understand how he got it or what it means. Below is a list of points on the graph of the linearized function. BTW the second value is just M but I have no idea why that is.

D=2.7 LD=4.31
D=1.9 LD=3.05
D=1.7 LD=2.79
D=1.2 LD=2.03
D=.8 LD=1.27
D=.4 LD=.76

When you graph this you will see that the data is in the form of a line with slope of approx. 1.5. I have no idea the principles behind these operations and need help.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't seem to fit the second set of numbers you gave, but to linearize a set of exponentially increasing numbers, you plot their logs. For example, if your numbers were (1,10), (2,100), (3,1000),..., this is an exponential curve, but plotting the log base ten of the y components, (1,1),(2,2),(3,3),... , gives a linear curve (aka line).
 
Last edited:
I presume you are wanting to use a semi-log plot as StatusX indicated.

Take the log (base 10) or ln (natural log) of either dependent or independent variable or both if necessary, and see if you get a straight line.

The mass, M, of a sphere of a material is simply the density \rho * volume, where volume is \frac{\pi}{6}D^3.

One can take Log(M) which takes the form a + b log D, which yields a straight line.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K