Liquid flow (river), viscosity, force, height etc.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the velocity of water flow in a laminar regime and determining the height change of the river surface based on given parameters. The user derived the surface velocity expression as u = (z² ρ g sin(θ)) / (2 η) for a river with a depth of 5m, surface velocity of 0.3m/s, and viscosity of 10^-3 kg/ms. The calculated height change over a distance of 2km yielded a value of approximately 4.8 x 10^-6 m, which the user found unexpectedly low. Additionally, another user inquired about calculating the force on a 1x1 m plate in a river with a flow rate of 320 cubic meters per second.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles, particularly laminar flow.
  • Familiarity with viscosity and its role in fluid motion.
  • Knowledge of basic calculus for integrating shear stress equations.
  • Concept of hydrostatic pressure and gravitational forces in fluid systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Navier-Stokes equations for a deeper understanding of fluid motion.
  • Learn about the effects of viscosity on flow rates in different fluids.
  • Research methods for calculating forces on submerged surfaces in fluid dynamics.
  • Explore the implications of laminar vs. turbulent flow in real-world applications.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in fluid mechanics, civil engineers working on hydraulic systems, and anyone involved in environmental studies related to river dynamics.

ApeXaviour
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hi. This is a two part question, I'm pretty sure about the first bit but in the second part my answer seems a bit weird. Not the order of magnitude I was expecting. Just wondering can anyone confirm or deny my suspician? Point me in more correct direction if I am indeed wrong. This isn't for anything, its just a problem sheet given out and this last question has been bugging me :)

(i)Water flows down a broad channel at an angle [tex]\theta[/tex] to the horizontal. [tex]\theta[/tex] is sufficiently small that the flow is laminar. By balancing the pressure from the gradient with the shear force due to viscosity (i.e. constant velocity flow) find an expression for the velocity of the surface of the water. Recall that the velocity adjacent to the channel bed is zero.

(ii)If the Liffey[A river in Dublin :redface:] is 5m deep, the surface water velocity is 0.3m/s and the viscosity of the water is 10^-3 kg/ms, find the height of the river surface between heuston stn and talbot bridge, a distance of 2km.


This is what I've got so far:

[tex]u[/tex] is the velocity
[tex]\rho[/tex] density of the water
[tex]z[/tex] is the height off the river bed (water depth when at surface)
[tex]\tau[/tex] is the shear stress
[tex]\eta[/tex] the viscosity
[tex]w l[/tex] arbitrary width and lengthThe shear stress between planes in a liquid is: [tex]\tau = \eta \frac{du}{dz}[/tex]

So the total force per unit area is

[tex]\frac{F_\tau}{A} = w l \eta \frac{du}{dz}[/tex]

Which must be equal to the gravitational force per unit area for steady flow:
[tex]\frac{F_g}{A} = m g Sin(\theta) = w l z \rho g Sin(\theta)[/tex]

so:
[tex]w l \eta \frac{du}{dz}= w l z \rho g Sin(\theta)[/tex]

[tex]\int_0^u \,du = \int_0^z \frac{z \rho g Sin(\theta)}{\eta} \,dz[/tex]
And hence the surface velocity is given by:
[tex]u = \frac{z^{2} \rho g Sin(\theta)}{2 \eta}[/tex]

So when I put in the figures I get
[tex]Sin(\theta) = \frac{2 u \eta}{z^{2} \rho g} = 2.4 \times 10^{-9} \cong \theta[/tex]

Then from triginometric relations, H the height change is given by:

[tex](2 \times 10^{3})(Tan(\theta)) \cong (\theta)(2 \times 10^{3}) = 4.8 \times 10^{-6}m[/tex] Which to me seems - and maybe my intuition is out of whack - just a little ridiculous.

Thanks
-Dec
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi
Sorry I can't help with your problem, maybe you could help with mine?
I would like to calculate the force on a 1X1 m plate placed in a river against the flow. The river flows at about 5 kmph and has a flow rate of 320 cubic metres per second. I don't have the width or depth of the river it is a big river. I hope you guys can help.

Regards

Tony Elston
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K