Liquid seperation of B-carotene and Chlorophyll-a

  • Thread starter Thread starter dibilo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Liquid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the liquid separation of B-carotene and Chlorophyll-a, with specific UV spectrometer peak readings noted for both compounds. B-carotene shows peaks at 448nm and 475.1nm, while Chlorophyll-a has peaks at 417.9nm and 666.1nm. Questions arise regarding the presence of two peaks for each compound, potential impurities, and the choice of blank for the UV test. The close proximity of B-carotene's peaks suggests poor resolution, which is considered normal due to its conjugated structure. Understanding the absorption wavelengths and color theory can clarify the observed results and the appearance of the solutions.
dibilo
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I have just done a liquid separation of B-carotene and Chlorophyll-a and put the 2 samples through a UV spectrometer.

The result that I get from the meter for B-carotene is 448nm for 1st peak and 475.1nm for 2nd peak.

For Chlorophyll-a my peaks are at 417.9nm and 666.1nm.

But I have a few questions here. Why are there 2 peaks for each of them? Is it normal? Is it due to the presence of impurities? Is it due to me not choosing the appropriate blank for the UV spectrometery test?

For the case of B-carotene, the 2 peaks are so close together which means they have really poor resolution. Is it normal?

Thanks in advance for anyone who can offer me a little guidance.

Regards,

dibilo.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
B-Carotene and Chlorophyll-a are conjugated organic molecules, the excitation spacing (pi to pi) for B-Carotene is closer together in the visible region since it's more conjugated. A lot of this stuff can be explained quantitatively by the particle in a box model.

You can ascertain the color of the solution by employing color methods, the two peaks represent the wavelengths that the molecule absorbs, familiarize yourself with some of the basic principles of "color theory" to understand why B-Carotene appears orange, for instance.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top