Load-Elongation Curve: Reading Elongation at a Load

  • Thread starter Thread starter Reveille
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on interpreting the load-elongation curve from a tensile test involving two plates, each initially measuring 165 mm. After testing, one plate elongated to 178 mm and the other to 188 mm. The user encountered discrepancies in elongation calculations based on a 1:2 mm scale graph, resulting in calculated elongations of 10.4 mm and 11.2 mm, which did not match the actual elongations of 13 mm and 23 mm, respectively. The user ultimately realized a misunderstanding in reading the elongation at a load.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensile testing procedures
  • Familiarity with load-elongation curves
  • Basic graph interpretation skills
  • Knowledge of measurement units (mm and kN)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of tensile testing and elongation measurement
  • Learn how to accurately interpret load-elongation curves
  • Explore graph scaling techniques in experimental data analysis
  • Investigate common errors in tensile test data interpretation
USEFUL FOR

Students in materials science, engineers conducting tensile tests, and professionals analyzing mechanical properties of materials.

Reveille
Messages
27
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I have done a tensile test.
Now that remains to do is create a table where the elongation (in mm) is shown at a specific load (in kN).

I had two plates that I put through the tensile test.
Both of them were 165 mm before the test.
After measuring after the test, the first has been stretched to 178 mm and the other has been stretched to 188 mm.

The problem I am having is that the supposed elongation doesn't seem to add up.

Homework Equations


index.jpg

Not an equation but the graph of the load-elongation curve.

3. The Attempt at a Solution

The graph has been drawn at a running speed of 1:2 mm.
I assumed the x-axis would be the elongation.
All I had to was draw a line down from the needed loads and multiply by because it's on a 1:2 mm scale.

However, the first one (the tall one), if I drew a line straight down at the end and measure the difference between start and end. It seems to be 5.2 mm, multiplied by two gives me 10.4 mm.
The actual elongation has been (178-165) = 13 mm. 10.4, 13 mm, it's still a difference.
The second one however seems to be 5.6 mm, multiplied by two gives me 11.2 mm.
It is actually (188-165) = 23 mm.
Now, that is a bit too big of a difference to me.

I have no idea what I'm doing wrong. Am I going into it with a completely wrong mindset?
I just can't seem to figure out how to read the elongation at a load.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured it out. I misread the explanation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
18K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K