Local flat space and the Riemann tensor

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between local flat space, represented by tangent planes on a manifold, and the Riemann tensor. Participants explore concepts related to curvature, the use of Cartesian coordinates in flat spaces, and the implications of these ideas for understanding manifolds in the context of physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a layman's explanation of the connection between local flat space and the Riemann tensor.
  • Another participant questions the background of the original poster, suggesting that terminology may not be accessible to all readers.
  • A participant with a background in solid state physics expresses confusion about the implications of using Cartesian coordinates at a point on a manifold, questioning whether this means the Riemann tensor is undefined at that point.
  • Another participant clarifies that the tangent plane is flat and emphasizes the need for a neighborhood around a point to discuss curvature, drawing an analogy to freshman calculus.
  • The same participant explains that the Riemann tensor operates with vectors from the tangent plane and describes how parallel transport of vectors around a loop reveals curvature.
  • A later reply suggests that working in Euclidean space on the tangent plane is a common approach, but emphasizes the need to consider curvature when analyzing neighborhoods around points.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and clarity regarding the concepts discussed. There is no consensus on the implications of using Cartesian coordinates or the definition of the Riemann tensor at a point, indicating ongoing uncertainty and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of considering neighborhoods around points on manifolds when discussing curvature, suggesting that the understanding of curvature is not limited to single points. There are unresolved questions about the definitions and implications of the Riemann tensor in relation to local flatness.

nigelscott
Messages
133
Reaction score
4
Can somebody explain in layman's terms the connection between local flat space (tangent planes) on a manifold and the Riemann tensor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think laymen know the terms you're using. What is your background? E.g., are you a university sophomore majoring in physics, ...?
 
No, just a person with an interest in this area. I studied solid state physics (QM) in college many years ago and like to keep my mind active by thinking about this stuff.

My understanding is that if I pick a point on a manifold that in the limit can be considered as being flat, I can use cartesian coordinates. If I uses cartesion coordinates the derivative of the metric tensor is 0 and covariant derivative become the ordinary derivative. So doesn't this imply that the Riemann tensor is not defined at that point? What am I not understanding?
 
If you want to visualize the tangent plane, you can visualize it as what it says: a plane that is tangent to the manifold. That means you can't visualize it as a small region of the manifold itself. The tangent plane isn't curved, it's flat, so you can't measure curvature within it.

nigelscott said:
My understanding is that if I pick a point on a manifold that in the limit can be considered as being flat, I can use cartesian coordinates.
To talk about curvature, you need more than a point, you need a neighborhood around the point. This is the same as in freshman calculus. If I tell you that the function f passes through the origin, that doesn't help you to calculate its curvature (second derivative) at the origin.

The connection between the tangent plane and the Riemann tensor would be that the Riemann tensor is an operator that works with vectors taken from the tangent plane. If you take a vector from the tangent plane and transport it around a little parallelogram, it's changed by the time it comes back to the start. There are four vectors from the tangent plane involved here: (1) the original vector, (2) the change in the original vector, (3) and (4) two vectors that describe the parallelogram. This is why the Riemann tensor has four indices.
 
OK, getting closer. So I can work I can work in Euclidean space on the tangent plane but if I want to get an idea of the curvature of space in that neighborhood I have to parallel transport one of the vectors from the tangent plane around a small loop and measure the angle change. Is this typically how problems involving manifolds are solved? i.e. work out things in simpler flat space time and then figure out how curvature impacts things.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K