Location of Safety Valve on a Pressure vessel

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the optimal location for safety relief valves on pressure vessels, particularly in the context of a tall refining separation column operating above atmospheric pressure. Participants explore various factors influencing valve placement, including safety considerations, fluid dynamics, and design codes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that safety relief valves should not be placed where individuals might be standing when they activate.
  • There is a consideration of transient effects such as thermal, mechanical, and fluid dynamics that could influence the valve's effectiveness based on its position.
  • One participant notes that many relief valves are typically installed on the top head of a vessel or near the top, implying a standard practice.
  • A specific case is mentioned regarding the BP Texas refinery explosion, where relief valves were located significantly lower on a vapor line, raising questions about the reasoning behind such placements.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the safety valve should be positioned above any potential liquid level in the vessel to ensure effective pressure relief without liquid interference.
  • Concerns are raised about the behavior of gas versus liquid during pressure relief, including issues related to viscosity and the potential for freezing or boiling hazards.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the optimal placement of safety relief valves, indicating that there is no consensus on a single ideal location. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best practices and reasoning behind different placements.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of safety valve placement, which may depend on specific design, engineering, and operational histories of pressure vessels. There are unresolved questions regarding the influence of various factors on valve effectiveness.

rollingstein
Messages
644
Reaction score
16
Is there a specific location (say top, bottom etc.) that a safety relieving valve is put on a pressure vessel? Say there's a tall refining separation column (operating above atmospheric pressure), where would logic (or codes) indicate that a pressure relief valve ought to be ideally placed.

Or does the exact location not matter?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well, common sense says you shouldn't put it in a place where somebody might be standing in front of it when it blows!

More seriously, you would have to consider the transient effects (e.g. thermal, mechanical, internal gas or fluid flows, chemical reactions, etc) when it blows. All those things could depend very much on its position.

This isn't my specialist subject, so I don't know about design codes - but I would be very surprised if there weren't any.
 
AlephZero said:
Well, common sense says you shouldn't put it in a place where somebody might be standing in front of it when it blows!

Of course! No, I sort of assumed that. (In fact a lot of them don't vent to the atmosphere at all but to a relief header)

Here's what motivated my question: In most situations I recall they were installed either on the top head of a vessel or somewhere close to the top of the vessel on a nozzle.

So I somehow assumed that as the standard location without thinking much about it.

And then just today I was reading the accident report about BP's 2004 Texas refinery explosion and there seem three relief valves all installed on a vapor line coming off the top of this distillation column and they seem 150 feet lower down from the top of the vessel.

That intrigued me: (a) The fact that relief was provided through an attached pipe and not on the body of the vessel itself. & (b) The vertical location was so much lower.

Yes, this if of course a specialized science, but I'm wondering what the reasoning might be...
 
rollingstein said:
Yes, this if of course a specialized science, but I'm wondering what the reasoning might be...

Tough to even speculate without design, engineering, fabrication, and use histories of the vessel. You could be looking at recycle, feed to another part of the plant (no longer in use) modified as pressure relief, just about anything.
 
Presumably the safety valve will be operated by gas pressure. The gas will be at the top of the pressure vessel. Any liquid will be at the bottom. The valve should be above the level of any possible liquid in the pressure vessel. The liquid will not be compressible but the gas will be. Venting the gas may retain all the liquid while relieving the pressure. The total mass released to lower the pressure will be less if it is the gas component that is released.

Gas has lower viscosity than liquid. Gas will cool as it is wasted, so it may freeze up the safety valve. A liquid on the other hand may boil as it is released which can provide a hazard and a back pressure that chokes the valve due to increasing volume.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
15K