Pressure Vessel Design Question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and testing requirements for a pressure vessel, specifically an ASME Section VIII Division 1 column. Participants explore the implications of vacuum ratings, historical documentation practices, and testing methodologies for pressure vessels, particularly in the context of older designs.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether it was previously required to specify vacuum ratings on the U-1 form, noting that the SIS states the vessel is safe for full vacuum, despite the U-1 not mentioning it.
  • Another participant shares their experience with pressure testing components, suggesting that vessels designed with support baffles may also be rated for vacuum, although they did not conduct vacuum testing themselves.
  • A different participant warns against using gas for pressure testing due to the risks associated with stored energy, advocating for water testing instead and suggesting methods to detect failures during such tests.
  • Another contributor emphasizes that testing should be conducted under controlled conditions and in compliance with regulations, expressing uncertainty about the requirements for repair testing and whether x-ray inspections are necessary at 240 psi.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the requirements for vacuum ratings and testing methodologies, indicating that there is no consensus on the best practices or historical requirements related to the U-1 documentation.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the historical context of ASME requirements, the specific conditions under which the vessel was designed, and the implications of using different testing methods. The discussion does not resolve these uncertainties.

serenahalterman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am replacing an existing ASME Section VIII Division 1 column. The U-1 states it is designed to 240psig @ 650degF, but does not say anything about being designed for vacuum conditions. The SIS for the column states that it is safe to operate under full vacuum. The SIS is not a code document, but the U-1 is. This vessel is from the 1950s. Does anyone know if it didn't use to be a requirement to specify if a pressure vessel was rated for vacuum on the U-1? I have run into this before with a different column so am wondering which document to trust, the U-1 or the SIS.

Thank you for your help!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I use to make component parts for heat exchangers. All our testing was done with water/air pressure and compliant to ASME code U-1a. If its a system that was designed with support baffles it may be rated for vacuum also. We never did any vacuum testing but we did a lot of pressure testing and in 5 years I only ever seen one failure and it was catastrophic, it was an outer seam tie in that blew and we were trying to make it fail. I think it was well over 2,000 psi at failure if my memory serves me correctly. It pealed it open like a tin can and damaged the blast barriers and rattled the entire building.

https://www.asme.org/about-asme/who-we-are/standards/asme-data-report-forms

I also found this It may be useful.

http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=258334
 
Last edited:
Pressure testing with a gas should be avoided whenever possible due to the enormous stored energy released on failure. It is also expensive because you must compress a significantly greater volume of air.

Be safe by using cold water instead. If necessary for physical support, also submerge the vessel being tested in water. Pressure rise during the test is rapid and controlled with little energy being required. The only way you may know when the vessel fails is when the internal pressure suddenly drops. You may need to have a coloured dye in the vessel so you can find the crack. While such a failure is destructive, it is usually repairable.
 
Testing should only be done on componet parts or designated test units. Under controlled conditions and in compliance with state laws. This being a repair as long as its repaired to code the inspector that signs of on it will probably make any determination on that. I have built them new but i have no idea what is required for repair testing if any. And at 240 psi I am not sure if you have to do a test or have it sent out for xray. But I am thinking U-1a standards will apply.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
80K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
26K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K