Log equation with two raised variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter QuarkCharmer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log Variables
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
11 replies · 3K views
QuarkCharmer
Messages
1,049
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


This is not a specific problem that I must complete, but I realized that I forgot how to solve these style problems!

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



For instance, off the top of my head:
[tex]3e^{x+1}=e^{x+2}[/tex]

I would divide both sides through by 5 to get:
[tex]3e^{x+1}=e^{x+2}[/tex]
^This should look like: 3e^(x+1)=e^(x+2), I don't know what is up with latex.

Then I would probably take the natural log of both sides, but that coefficient is messing up my idea. Can I do this?
[tex](x+1)ln3e = (x+2)lne[/tex]
[tex](x+1)ln3e = (x+2)[/tex]
[tex]xln3e + ln3e = x+2[/tex]
[tex]x(ln3e + ln3e) = x+2[/tex]
[tex]x(ln3e + ln3e) - x = 2[/tex]
[tex]x((ln3e + ln3e) - 1 = 2[/tex]
[tex]ln3e + ln3e - 1 = \frac{2}{x}[/tex]

If that is even possible, which I highly doubt, I am stuck.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the question this:-

[tex]15e^{x+1} = 5e^{x+2}[/tex]
 
Yes it is.
 
QuarkCharmer said:

Homework Statement


This is not a specific problem that I must complete, but I realized that I forgot how to solve these style problems!

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



For instance, off the top of my head:
[tex]15e^{x+1}=5e^{x+2}[/tex]
Fixed the LaTeX in the equation above. Here's what you do.
[tex]15e^{x+1} - 5e^{x+2} = 0[/tex]
[tex]15e\cdot e^x - 5e^2 \cdot e^x = 0[/tex]
[tex]5e^x(3e - e^2 ) = 0[/tex]
Then either 5ex = 0 or 3e - e2 = 0, neither of which can happen.


QuarkCharmer said:
I would divide both sides through by 5 to get:
[tex]3e^(x+1)=e^(x+2)[/tex]
^This should look like: 3e^(x+1)=e^(x+2), I don't know what is up with latex.

Then I would probably take the natural log of both sides, but that coefficient is messing up my idea. Can I do this?
[tex](x+1)ln3e = (x+2)lne[/tex]
[tex](x+1)ln3e = (x+2)[/tex]
[tex]xln3e + ln3e = x+2[/tex]
[tex]x(ln3e + ln3e) = x+2[/tex]
[tex]x(ln3e + ln3e) - x = 2[/tex]
[tex]x((ln3e + ln3e) - 1 = 2[/tex]
[tex]ln3e + ln3e - 1 = \frac{2}{x}[/tex]

If that is even possible, which I highly doubt, I am stuck.
 
I repaired the latex, thank you, the code seems to have changed on me!

I don't really mean (this) specific problem, just anything with the general form
e^x+a = e^x+b

Always unsolvable?

Edit: Now that I think about it, I think one of the exponents was negative in the problems I am talking about.
e^x = e^-x
 
QuarkCharmer said:
I repaired the latex, thank you, the code seems to have changed on me!

I don't really mean (this) specific problem, just anything with the general form
e^x+a = e^x+b
If you write them that way, you need parentheses, as in
e^(x + a) = e^(x + b)

At least that's what I think you mean.
With this equation, you can take the log of both sides, to get x + a = x + b, which is a true statement iff a = b.
QuarkCharmer said:
Always unsolvable?

Edit: Now that I think about it, I think one of the exponents was negative in the problems I am talking about.
e^x = e^-x

Again, take the log of each side, which results in the equation x = -x, or 2x = 0, or x = 0.
 
x=-x and 2x=0 isn't really possible unless x = 0, but I don't understand how you methodically arrived at that conclusion. How would you solve these types algebraically if possible, and how would you solve a similar problem with the coefficient attached such that:
[tex]2e^{(x+1)} = e^{-(x+2)}[/tex]
 
QuarkCharmer said:
x=-x and 2x=0 isn't really possible unless x = 0, but I don't understand how you methodically arrived at that conclusion. How would you solve these types algebraically if possible, and how would you solve a similar problem with the coefficient attached such that:
[tex]2e^{(x+1)} = e^{-(x+2)}[/tex]

I tried to solve it like this:-

[tex]2e^{(x+1)} = e^{-(x+2)}[/tex]

[itex]\Rightarrow[/itex][itex]2=\frac{e^{-x-2}}{e^{x+1}}[/itex]

[itex]\Rightarrow[/itex][itex]2=e^{-2x-3}[/itex]

[itex]\Rightarrow[/itex][itex]\log_e 2=-2x-3[/itex]

Try solving it further :smile:
 
I see how to solve that, but I am unsure how you reached this step?
[tex]2=e^{-2x-3}[/tex]

How does
[tex]\frac{e^{-x-2}}{e^{x+1}} = e^{-2x-3}[/tex]

You are just subtracting the exponents? I guess I never considered that lol.
 
QuarkCharmer said:
I see how to solve that, but I am unsure how you reached this step?
[tex]2=e^{-2x-3}[/tex]

How does
[tex]\frac{e^{-x-2}}{e^{x+1}} = e^{-2x-3}[/tex]

You are just subtracting the exponents? I guess I never considered that lol.

Yeah, i am subtracting the exponents...:smile:
 
QuarkCharmer said:
I see how to solve that, but I am unsure how you reached this step?
[tex]2=e^{-2x-3}[/tex]

How does
[tex]\frac{e^{-x-2}}{e^{x+1}} = e^{-2x-3}[/tex]

You are just subtracting the exponents? I guess I never considered that lol.
If you are brushing up on solving exponential equations, you really ought to review the basic rules of exponents and the rules of logarithms...
 
Mark44 said:
If you are brushing up on solving exponential equations, you really ought to review the basic rules of exponents and the rules of logarithms...

I came to the same conclusion.