Looking for Textbook Suggestions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the search for textbook references related to Fubini's theorem, particularly in the context of double integrals and the conditions under which they can be separated. Participants share their experiences with a professor's requirements for proof and textbook citations, highlighting issues of grading and understanding in calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their experience of receiving a zero on test questions related to the separation of double integrals, despite believing their approach was correct.
  • Another participant suggests that the professor may be looking for more details and references Fubini's theorem as a foundational concept that should be included in calculus textbooks.
  • A third participant mentions the difficulty of finding a textbook that matches their specific proof and notes that they had to consult multiple sources, including pirated textbooks, to find a suitable reference.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential dangers of applying the theorem without considering the condition of absolute integrability, which could lead to incorrect results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the professor's grading and expectations, with some feeling frustrated by the lack of credit for their work. There is no consensus on the appropriateness of the professor's demands or the clarity of the theorem's application.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of absolute integrability in the application of Fubini's theorem, indicating that the discussion may hinge on specific mathematical conditions that are not universally understood or agreed upon.

wintermute++
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Funny story, or maybe I'm just dumb and don't understand why my professor is being all petulant about this.

∫∫h(x,y)dA

If z = h(x,y) and h(x,y) = f(x)g(y)

∫∫f(x)g(y)dxdy = ∫f(x)dx∫g(y)dy

I did this on my own while working through some double integral hw. Seems obvious, and the answers were always correct. Used it on the test, got a 0 for each question I did. Was told to prove it for credit, so I did.

No credit given. Now the teacher demands I give him a single page from a textbook with this in it before I can earn credit and I'm pissed because it's not in any of our libraries textbooks, yet I've found googledocs from other universities that show it as an example.

Sooooo please, please. If any of you out there have a textbook with this example in it, please tell me what it is so I can hunt a copy down and not get a fail where I should have had a 92. I will owe you one cookie for your efforts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know of Fubini's Theorem. Surprisingly though, I had to pirate about 25 Calculus textbooks to find my exact proof, written how I did it, and I only found that in a "special case" section in a Stewart textbook.

I only got an 8/10 instead of a 10/10 though, because the professor assumed I was just guessing. Despite my sending him the proof. Whatever, I'm only 1/5 pissed off anymore.

The Professor also warned me about it being a "dangerous" equation for some reason. Any explanation for that?
 
It is dangerous if the condition of absolute integrability is ignored, as the result need not hold in that case.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K