Looking for the logic behind this

  • Thread starter Thread starter cdux
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic
cdux
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
We got a bunch of balls numbered 1 to n. And we got a bunch of bowls numbered also 1 to n.

What is the chance of ball x hitting bowl x after dropping each ball randomly in a bowl one by one?

The answer involves saying 1/n after going (n-1)!/n! and I wonder, what is the full logic behind it?

I think I can get the denominator as a collection of all the shuffling results, but what is the exact logic that leads to the numerator being (n-1)!?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey cdux.

The key thing you have to specify is whether the probability changes after a ball is released (or a specific bowl is hit).

If the probabilities don't change at all with respect to the above attributes then probability is always the same and under a uniform distribution (all probabilities are likely) then the probability is 1/n for all bowls.

If the assumptions are different then you will get a different distribution (the above is the simplest case with the easiest assumptions).
 
The question didn't specify so they are probably equiprobable. Being from the beginning of a book, I guess it's certain.

PS. I'm mainly interested in the logic of (n-1)!/n! (that led to 1/n) rather than going directly to 1/n.
 
When placing the kth ball, you have to put it in one of the k remaining empty bowls. You can't drop it on the floor or put it in your pocket. That places a constraint on the placement. You have k-1 choices rather than k choices as to where to place that kth ball. If you don't put it into one of the first k-1 empty bowls you have no choice but to drop it into the last empty bowl.
 
cdux said:
We got a bunch of balls numbered 1 to n. And we got a bunch of bowls numbered also 1 to n.

What is the chance of ball x hitting bowl x after dropping each ball randomly in a bowl one by one?

The answer involves saying 1/n after going (n-1)!/n! and I wonder, what is the full logic behind it?

I think I can get the denominator as a collection of all the shuffling results, but what is the exact logic that leads to the numerator being (n-1)!?

Try this: if ball x falls in bowl x, how many ways can the other n-1 balls be placed? What fraction is that of the total number of ways of placing n balls?
 
OK I have a mental image of a base of containers shuffling around that nets a result of n! states. Then if you hold into place k ball into container k then you can shuffle the balls only in (n-1)! ways which produces our desired (n-1)!/n! result for classical probability N(A)/N(Ω).

But there may be a missing link in the logic here because I suspect I was biased by knowing the answer when reaching that interpretation.

Is there really a concrete way of looking at probability that involves 'holding the desired result into place' while all the rest outcomes 'shuffle' around it?

It sounds impressive for a movie but I wonder if it has holes. i.e. exceptions.



The logic of subtracting elements from the numerator group for more successes appears to be correct since the answer is also (n-l)!/n! for l successes.

Going to the extreme of n successes appears to make it easier to understand since that would net 0!/n! which is what one would expect for the chance of getting an n! combination right.

If you're going to have 2 failures in matching, it doubles the probability of the contraption, and 3 failures can shuffle around in 6 ways making the probability of that X 6 of the initial. So it might be another case of thinking of failures instead of successes might be more direct.



..And you don't want to see the answer for "at least l successes..".
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top