Loop the Loop Problem Solution | N > 0, Energy Conservation Method

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This discussion revolves around a physics problem related to the motion of an object in a loop, specifically focusing on the conditions necessary for the object to maintain contact with the track. The subject area includes concepts of energy conservation and centripetal force.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of setting the normal force \( N \) to zero and question the minimum height required for the object to loop the loop. There are discussions about using energy conservation versus Newton's laws to approach the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the conditions for \( N > 0 \) and the implications of starting at different heights. Some guidance has been offered on the use of energy conservation, and there is acknowledgment of the complexity of solving the problem without it.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential typos and clarifications needed in the original posts, as well as the distinction between \( N > 0 \) and \( N \ge 0 \) being considered irrelevant in practical terms. The discussion reflects a mix of theoretical and practical considerations regarding the problem setup.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1683674020881.png

The solution is,
1683674075941.png

Does someone please know why ##N > 0##. I though at the min speed to still go around the loop, we could set ##N = 0## and ##mg## provides the centripetal force.

Also, I am wondering how to do this problem with using energy conservation.

My working is
## N + mg = \frac{mv^2}{R}##
##mgy_1 = mgy_2 + \frac{1}{2}mv^2##
##mgy_1 = 2mgR + \frac{R(N + mg)}{2}##
##y_1 = 2R + \frac{R(N + mg)}{2mg}##
##y_1 = R(\frac{N}{2mg} + \frac{5}{2})##

However, I am not to sure how to go from here. If I assume that ##N = 0## I get ##y_1 = \frac{5R}{2}## so any height greater than or equal to ##y_1## the object should loop the loop?

Many thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
ChiralSuperfields said:
Does someone please know why ##N > 0##. I though at the min speed to still go around the loop, we could set ##N = 0## and ##mg## provides the centripetal force.
What happens to ##N## if we start at higher than ##y = \frac{5R}{2}##?

If you are just asking about the criterion ##N>0##, because at ##N=0## it has lost contact with the track.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
ChiralSuperfields said:
Also, I am wondering how to do this problem without using energy conservation.

My working is
## N + mg = \frac{mv^2}{R}##
##\color{red}{mgy_1 = mgy_2 + \frac{1}{2}mv^2}##
##mgy_1 = 2mgR + \frac{R(N + mg)}{2}##
##y_1 = 2R + \frac{R(N + mg)}{2mg}##
##y_1 = R(\frac{N}{2mg} + \frac{5}{2})##

However, I am not to sure how to go from here. If I assume that ##N = 0## I get ##y_1 = \frac{5R}{2}## so any height greater than or equal to ##y_1## the object should loop the loop?

Many thanks!
If you want to solve the problem without using energy conservation, you cannot use the equation in red which expresses energy conservation. You have to solve Newton's second law equation for the trajectory. I don;t think it can be done analytically. That is why you use energy conservation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
Thank you for your replies @erobz and @kuruman!

Yes sorry there was a typo in the Post #1. I was asking how to solve this problem using energy conservation.

Many thanks!
 
The solution that you posted uses energy conservation (first equation). Take a good look at it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz and member 731016
erobz said:
What happens to ##N## if we start at higher than ##y = \frac{5R}{2}##?

If you are just asking about the criterion ##N>0##, because at ##N=0## it has lost contact with the track.
Thank you for your reply @erobz!

If we start a very small increment little higher than y_1 then ##N## could be ##0.00000001N##

Many thanks!
 
kuruman said:
The solution that you posted uses energy conservation (first equation). Take a good look at it.
True! Thank you @kuruman!
 
erobz said:
If you are just asking about the criterion ##N>0##, because at ##N=0## it has lost contact with the track.
No experiment can distinguish reliably between ##N>0## and ##N \ge 0##. So as a question about physics, the distinctiont is irrelevant.

However, putting on my mathematician's hat, the correct statement is that at [calculated] ##N < 0## it has lost contact with the track. At ##N=0## the trajectory of the ball is neither accelerating into the track nor accelerating away from the track. It is maintaining zero separation. Zero separation is the criterion I would use for "in contact".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016, SammyS and erobz
jbriggs444 said:
No experiment can distinguish reliably between ##N>0## and ##N \ge 0##. So as a question about physics, the distinctiont is irrelevant.

However, putting on my mathematician's hat, the correct statement is that at [calculated] ##N < 0## it has lost contact with the track. At ##N=0## the trajectory of the ball is neither accelerating into the track nor accelerating away from the track. It is maintaining zero separation. Zero separation is the criterion I would use for "in contact".
Thank you for your help @jbriggs444 ! That is very helpful!
 

Similar threads

Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K