Loop-the-Loop with rotational motion

Click For Summary
To determine the height from which a spherical ball must be released to complete a loop-the-loop, the initial potential energy must equal the sum of translational and rotational kinetic energy at the top of the loop. The minimum speed required at the top is approximately 5.05 m/s, leading to the equation mgH = 1/2(mv^2 + Iw^2). The correct moment of inertia for a sphere is I = 2/5mR^2, and using algebra reveals that the height should be h = (19/10)R, which simplifies to Δh = 7/10R. The calculations suggest a release height of about 4.94 m above the loop's top, but there was confusion regarding the potential energy remaining at the loop's peak.
nahya
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
A small spherical ball of radius r = 1.5 cm rolls without slipping down a ramp and around a loop-the-loop of radius R = 2.6 m. The ball has mass M = 358 g.

How high above the top of the loop must it be released in order that the ball just makes it around the loop?
---
i just calculated the height above zero potential energy (ground) and subtract 2R from it after my calculations.
the initial potential energy, then, is p = mgH.
at the top of the loop, the potential energy is all converted to translational and rotational KE, so...
mgH = 1/2(mv^2 + Iw^2).
the minimum speed needed to barely complete the loop is Sqrt(gR), which, in this case, is ~5.05 m/s.
I = 2/5mR^2 and w = v/R, so Iw^2 = 2/5mv^2
gH = 1/2(v^2 + 2/5v^2) = 1/2v^2(1 + 2/5) = 0.7v^2
so i get H = 1.8216, which is less than the radius of the loop!
this can't be right...
what am i doing wrong?
the equation for the minimum vel is correct, right?
then i should be doing this right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You equation is right, before you put numbers into your equations, use algebra. This gives a nice equation that cancels down to:
h = (19/10) R
But the delta 'h' is the change in height from where the sphere is released to the top of the loop. You don't need to subtract 2R.

Regards,
Sam
 
hmm... h = 1.9 * 2.6 = 4.94 m above 2R, but it says that it's incorrect.
bleh TT
 
At the top of the loop there will still be some potential energy.
E_p = 2mgR
 
nahya said:
hmm... h = 1.9 * 2.6 = 4.94 m above 2R, but it says that it's incorrect.
bleh TT

Sorry, I got the moment of inertia for a sphere wrong. It should be:
\Delta h=\frac{7}{10} R.

Is that what your answer should be. Sorry about the mistake.

Regards,
Sam
 
Last edited:
mg\Delta h= \frac{1}{2} (mv^2 + I \omega^2)
v= \sqrt{gR} \ \ I = \frac{2}{5} mr^2

These are the formulae I used
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K