Lorentz Contraction and Mass Distortion Calculation- Did I do this right?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of Lorentz contraction and mass distortion calculations for a hypothetical scenario involving a dog named Little Ann, accelerated to 99.9% of the speed of light. The user converted Little Ann's length from inches to meters and applied the Lorentz contraction formula, resulting in an estimated contracted length of approximately 1.74 inches. Additionally, the mass distortion calculation yielded a mass of about 1409.08 pounds, demonstrating the significant effects of relativistic speeds on mass and length. The user seeks verification of these calculations for accuracy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz contraction and mass distortion equations
  • Ability to perform unit conversions (inches to meters)
  • Familiarity with relativistic physics concepts
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of relativistic speeds on biological entities
  • Learn more about the Lorentz transformation equations
  • Explore the effects of acceleration on physical objects at high speeds
  • Investigate practical applications of relativistic physics in modern technology
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, students studying relativity, and anyone interested in the effects of high-speed travel on mass and length.

Liger20
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hello, I recently learned of the Lorentz contraction and mass distortion effect in a physics
book, and for the sheer heck of it, I decided to see what it would be like if my dog, Little
Ann, were sped up to relativistic speeds. I decided to try to calculate it using the equations
provided by the book I was using. I’m pretty sure that I’ve done this right, but I would like to be 100% sure, so I’d really appreciate it if someone could tell me whether or not I’ve done these calculations correctly.

Little Ann weighs about 63 pounds. She is about 39 inches long, give or take about two inches (she wiggled a lot when I measured her). Since the equations have to be in meters, let's convert 39 inches into .9906 meters. I wanted to see what it would be like if Little Ann were sped up to 99.9 percent the speed of light (ignoring the fact that speeds that high would kill her).

So I took the equation for Lorentz contraction:

L=(1-u^2)^½

=(1-.999^2)^½

= (.0447101778)(.9906)

=.0442899021 meters

=1.743697 +/- 2 inches


So Lorentz contraction would make her around 1.74 inches long +/- about two inches. ( I know that’s not very precise, but it was the best I could do given that she is so hyperactive.)

Then I calculated mass distortion:

M=(1-.999^2)^-½

M=22.4

(63 lbs)(22.36627204)=1409.075139 lbs.
Again, I’m pretty sure I did this right, but I would appreciate it if someone could verify that everything is correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks OK to me.

(FYI: High speeds won't kill her--but the acceleration might.)
 
Okay, thanks a lot!

Why would the acceleration kill her?
 
If you give her too great an acceleration, you might crush her. But the main point is that a constant velocity won't affect her, no matter how fast it is. (Consider that right now you're moving pretty fast with respect to something. Feel any different?)
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 184 ·
7
Replies
184
Views
23K
Replies
4
Views
12K