Lorentz Factor Variant: Derivation & Angle Dependence

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of a variant of the Lorentz factor, specifically the formula 1/(sqrt(1-v²*sin(a)/c²)+v*cos(a)), which the original poster claims is correct. However, the established Lorentz factor is definitively 1/sqrt(1-v²/c²) and does not depend on the angle of relative motion. The consensus among participants is that the Lorentz factor remains constant regardless of the orientation of velocity, and the original premise of angle dependence is incorrect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with the Lorentz factor and its standard formula
  • Basic knowledge of vector mathematics
  • Awareness of the relativistic Doppler effect
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the standard Lorentz factor in special relativity
  • Explore the implications of the relativistic Doppler effect
  • Learn about the mathematical properties of vectors in physics
  • Investigate common misconceptions in relativity theories
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of special relativity and the Lorentz factor.

TheSurfers12
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I saw that lorentz factor could change depending of the angle of the relative movement.
I made a derivation of a general transform of the lorentz factor but i still looking in books that the lorentz factor is 1/sqrt(1-v^^2/c^^2) and my derivation is perfectly correct, my result is 1/(sqrt(1-v^^2*sin(a)/c^^2)+v*cos(a)), if we put here 90 degrees we get the classical lorentz factor. Am i right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's ##a##? How did you derive this formula?
 
TheSurfers12 said:
Summary:: I saw that lorentz factor could change depending of the angle of the relative movement.

I made a derivation of a general transform of the lorentz factor but i still looking in books that the lorentz factor is 1/sqrt(1-v^^2/c^^2) and my derivation is perfectly correct, my result is 1/(sqrt(1-v^^2*sin(a)/c^^2)+v*cos(a)), if we put here 90 degrees we get the classical lorentz factor. Am i right?
The Lorentz factor depends on the relative speed between two frames of reference, and is always ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}##.

The relativistic Doppler effect depends on the angle between the emitted light and the direction of relative motion and the relevant formula involves this angle.
 
Ibix said:
What's ##a##? How did you derive this formula?
(Link to bogus source removed by mentors)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sorry I asked. Please review the site rules on discussing personal theories.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
I think if ##\vec{\beta} = \frac{1}{c}\vec{v}## is the velocity of the primed frame w.r.t. the unprimed frame, then the gamma factor between the frames is$$\gamma^{-1} = \sqrt{1-\vec{\beta} \cdot \vec{\beta}}$$That is in no way dependent on the orientation of ##\vec{\beta}## as measured in the unprimed coordinate system.
 
Thread is now in Moderation pending Mentor review...
 
TheSurfers12 said:
Summary:: I saw that lorentz factor could change depending of the angle of the relative movement.
That’s because you were looking at a (unfortunately familiar) crackpot website, the one you linked to post #4. That website is garbage, and just about nothing it says about relativity can be trusted.

So the answer to your question (does the Lorentz factor depend on the angle?) is no.

This thread is closed because it has started with a false premise.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix and PeroK
Ibix said:
I'm sorry I asked. Please review the site rules on discussing personal theories.
Well, we’re glad that you did.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K