Lorentz Fitzgerald contraction

  • Thread starter Ritika
  • Start date
  • #1
1
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Does the lorentz fitzgerald contraction hypothesis contradicts the classical motion of rigid body?
I am not sure but i think it doesn't contradicts the classical motion of rigid body.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Nugatory
Mentor
12,615
5,165
There is no such thing as a classically rigid body in relativity. Google and search here for "Born rigidity" for more.
 
  • #3
1,997
5
There is no such thing as a classically rigid body in relativity. Google and search here for "Born rigidity" for more.
Born rigidity only applies when proper acceleration is involved it has absolutely nothing to do with relative motion without proper acceleration.
 
  • #4
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
2019 Award
28,281
8,042
Born rigidity only applies when proper acceleration is involved
This is not correct. It is perfectly possible to have a Born rigid geodesic congruence. The simplest example is a congruence of parallel inertial worldlines in Minkowski spacetime.
 
  • #5
1,997
5
This is not correct. It is perfectly possible to have a Born rigid geodesic congruence. The simplest example is a congruence of parallel inertial worldlines in Minkowski spacetime.
Ok then, what is the difference between a Born rigid and a non Born rigid congruence of parallel intertial worldlines in Minkowski spacetime?

If there is no acceleration it is totally useless to talk about something being Born rigid.
 
  • #6
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
2019 Award
28,281
8,042
what is the difference between a Born rigid and a non Born rigid congruence of parallel intertial worldlines in Minkowski spacetime?
The first one exists and the second one doesn't. Every congruence of parallel inertial worldlines in Minkowski spacetime is Born rigid.
 
  • #7
clem
Science Advisor
1,308
15
"Does the lorentz fitzgerald contraction hypothesis contradicts the classical motion of rigid body?"
The classical definition of a rigid body, that it retains its shape when moving, is contradicted by special relativity. An SR definition of a rigid body is that it retains its shape in its instantaneous rest system, even while moving. You could look at
arXiv:1105.3899.
 
  • #8
1,997
5
"Does the lorentz fitzgerald contraction hypothesis contradicts the classical motion of rigid body?"
The classical definition of a rigid body, that it retains its shape when moving, is contradicted by special relativity. An SR definition of a rigid body is that it retains its shape in its instantaneous rest system, even while moving. You could look at
arXiv:1105.3899.
What is your definition of moving?

In SR there is no such thing as absolute movement, all movement is relative.
What is not relative is proper acceleration.
 
  • #9
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
2019 Award
28,281
8,042
An SR definition of a rigid body is that it retains its shape in its instantaneous rest system, even while moving.
This isn't a good definition as it stands, since, as MeJennifer points out, "moving" has no absolute meaning in relativity.

In relativity, there is no such thing as a "rigid body" in the classical sense, because internal forces between different parts of an object are not instantaneous; they can only be transmitted at the speed of light. The best that can be done in relativity is Born rigidity. The technical definition of Born rigidity is that the congruence of worldlines that describes the body (one worldline for each point in the body) must have zero expansion and shear. Heuristically, this means the distances between different parts of the body are constant. However, the conditions under which this is even possible are quite restrictive, much more so than in Newtonian physics, because of the Herglotz-Noether theorem (which you can look up for more info).
 

Related Threads on Lorentz Fitzgerald contraction

  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
64
Views
10K
Replies
85
Views
13K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Last Post
16
Replies
389
Views
38K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
580
Replies
5
Views
2K
Top