Lorentz Transformation Derivation

  • Thread starter jimbobian
  • Start date
  • #1
52
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hi everyone, I am looking into relativity as preparation for university and I was wondering if anyone could help me out with this.

I am reading Six Not-So-Easy-Pieces and in it Feynman uses the Lorentz transformation and 'derives' it, by showing that Lorentz contraction is necessary to account for the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment. He then shows that in a primed system that has contracted due to its motion, the distance to a fixed point will also contract and so an observer can calculate the 'real' distance as:
\begin{align}
x &= x'{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}
\end{align}
As the primed system is moving towards the fixed point:
\begin{align}
x &= x'{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}} + ut
\end{align}
Thus:
\begin{align}
x' &= \frac{x - ut}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}
\end{align}
Now I don't like this way for two reasons:
1) It presupposes the Lorentz contraction rather than showing it as a result of the Lorentz transformation
2) It is seemingly invented to 'fix' the experiment

So, I asked Google and found http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/lorentztrans.html" [Broken]

Although I have yet to completely follow through with their reasoning, it too uses Lorentz contraction and time dilation.

So my question is firstly, is it OK to derive the Lorentz transformations using length contraction and time dilation. Surely that is a 'circular derivation'! If not, then how can it be derived by other means.

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Bill_K
Science Advisor
Insights Author
4,155
195
Yes, Einstein originally obtained it as the transformation that preserved Maxwell's Equations, or more specifically the wave equation.
 
  • #3
jtbell
Mentor
15,557
3,520
In Einstein's book Relativity: The Special and General Theory, he presents a derivation of the Lorentz transformation starting from the assumption that the speed of a light-signal is the same in any inertial reference frame:

http://www.bartleby.com/173/a1.html
 
  • #4
2,967
5
If you know PDEs, then check out the original article by Einstein:

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

For Einstein, the concept of synchronization of clocks plays essential role.

Also, time dilation, length contraction and velocity composition may be derived without using Lorentz transformation. This is shown by the use of the 'light clock'.
 
  • #5
52
0
Thank you all for your replies, it all makes sense to me now (or at least the order)!

@dickfore - Unfortunately I don't know PDEs, but that might be another port of call for me this summer!
 

Related Threads on Lorentz Transformation Derivation

  • Last Post
4
Replies
78
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
962
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
15K
Top