Losing ability of solving problems.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bunsen
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
It's common for individuals to lose problem-solving skills in mathematics and physics if they don't practice regularly, especially after transitioning from academic study to research-focused work. In this case, the individual has shifted from solving ordinary and partial differential equations (ODEs and PDEs) by hand to focusing on interpretation and understanding in the context of turbulence modeling, leading to a decline in their manual solving abilities. However, re-learning these skills is manageable for those who were once proficient. Engaging with undergraduate textbooks periodically, such as during holidays, can help refresh these skills and rekindle familiarity with various problem-solving techniques.
Bunsen
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi guys!

Well, when I was a B.Sc and/or a M.Sc student I used to solve lots of exercises from books in order to prepare myself for exams. I was really familiar with many methods for solving ODE and PDE by hand and I was comfortable by doing it.

But since 3 years I am only working in research and, since the equations involved in my field (turbulence modeling) are unsolvable by hand for the complex situations which I work on, I just stopped to really "solve" them and in the last years I have focussed in their interpretation and in the understanding of concepts. Because of that, now I feel I have lost/forgotten a lot of tools required for solving the simple cases by hand, even when I understand the equations much better than what I did 3 years ago.

Do you think this situation is normal? or I am doing something wrong?

Thanks a lot for your comments...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Unfortunately yes, it's normal to lose your skills if you don't use them on a regular basis.

The good thing is that re-learning them isn't all that difficult if you were proficient once.
 
Twice a year, typically around holidays, I take a couple undergrad physics books off the shelf and a math methods book. For example:

Byron and Fuller, Griffiths E&M, and Morin's Classical Mechanics. Then I try to solve a bunch of problems over a few days cold. If I forget a technique I give myself a crash course. Every christmas, spring holiday, Thanksgiving, etc I try to do this. It's nostalgic and fun.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top