MHB Louis's Question from YahooAnswers:Fp1 Polynomial and roots question Help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CaptainBlack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial Roots
CaptainBlack
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
Question:
1.Find the range of values of \(a\) for which \[(2-3a)x^2+(4-a)x+2=0\]has real roots.2. If the roots of the equation \(4x^3+7x^2-5x-1=0\) are \(\alpha\) , \(\beta\) and \( \gamma\),find the equation whose roots are:
(a) \( \alpha+1,\beta+1\) and \(\gamma+1\)
(b) \(\alpha^2 \beta^2\) and \( \gamma^2 \)CB
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Answer:
Part 1.
For a quadratic \(ax^2+bx+c\) the discriminant is \(b^2-4ac\) this is the term that appears under the square root sign in the quadratic formula: \[x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac} }{2a}\]for the solution of \(ax^2+bx+c=0\). The quadratic equation has real roots precisely when the discriminant is non-negative.The discriminant of \((2-3a)x^2+(4-a)x+2\) is \((4-a)^2-4(2-3a)2=a^2+16a\). Because the discriminant is positive for large \(|a|\) the discriminant is negative between the roots of \(a^2+16a\) which is on the interval \( (-16,0)\). Hence the discriminant is non-negative when \(a \lt -16\) or \(a \gt 0\) and so \((2-3a)x^2+(4-a)x+2=0\) has real roots when \(a \lt -16\) or \(a \gt0\).Part 2.
You may know Vieta's relations for the roots and coefficients of polynomials or cubics in particular or we can derive them:For a cubic \(ax^3+bx^2+cx+d\) with roots \(\alpha,\beta\) and \(\beta\) we have:\[\begin{aligned}a(x-\alpha)(x-\beta)(x-\gamma)&=ax^3-a(\alpha+\beta+\gamma)x^2+a(\alpha\beta+\alpha \gamma+\beta \gamma)x-a(\alpha\beta \gamma)\\ &=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d \end{aligned}\] means that \(b=-a(\alpha+\beta+\gamma)\), \(c=a(\alpha\beta+\alpha \gamma+\beta \gamma)\) and \(d=-a(\alpha\beta \gamma)\).So for the cubic \(4x^3+7x^2-5x-1\) we have:
\(\alpha+\beta+\gamma=-7/4\)
\(\alpha\beta+\alpha\gamma+\beta\gamma=-5/4\)
\(\alpha\beta\gamma=1/4\)(a) Let the equation with roots \( \alpha+1,\beta+1\) and \(\gamma+1\) be:\[x^3+ux^2+vx+w=0\] (we can of course multiply this by any constant we want if we want the left hand side to not be monic). Now from the relations between coefficients and roots we know that \[\begin{aligned}w&=-( \alpha+1)(\beta+1)(\gamma+1)\\ &=-(\alpha \beta \gamma + \alpha\beta + \alpha \gamma + \beta \gamma +\alpha+\beta+\gamma +1) \\ &= - \frac{1}{4} + \frac{5}{4} + \frac{7}{4} -1=\frac{7}{4} \end{aligned}\]
\[\begin{aligned}v&=( \alpha+1)(\beta+1)+(\alpha+1)(\gamma+1)+(\beta+1)(\gamma+1) \\
&=\alpha\beta+\alpha+\beta+1+\alpha \gamma+\alpha+\gamma+1+\beta \gamma+\beta+\gamma +1\\
&=(\alpha\beta+\alpha \gamma+\beta \gamma)+2(\alpha+\beta+\gamma)+3\\
&=\dots
\end{aligned}\]...to be continued? Probably not, there is enough here to indicate how to complete the solution.

CB
 
Last edited:
For part a) of question 2, we could simply translate the polynomial 1 unit to the right, i.e.:

$\displaystyle 4(x-1)^3+7(x-1)^2-5(x-1)-1=0$
 
MarkFL said:
For part a) of question 2, we could simply translate the polynomial 1 unit to the right, i.e.:

$\displaystyle 4(x-1)^3+7(x-1)^2-5(x-1)-1=0$

Yes, but since we are going to need Viete's relations for the next part (and I don't want to provide two different approaches we might as well use them for both parts)

cb
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top