LTC4440 LTSpice simulation problems?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around issues encountered while simulating the LTC4440 high side MOSFET driver in LTSpice. Participants are exploring the functionality of the driver, particularly its ability to boost gate control voltage for driving MOSFETs under specified conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports that the LTC4440 does not seem to provide the necessary boost to the gate control in their LTSpice simulation, raising concerns about its ability to drive a MOSFET with a specified drain voltage of 70V.
  • Another participant points out that the original poster may have forgotten to attach the relevant schematic for further analysis.
  • A later reply suggests that the boost section of the circuit was not connected correctly and advises checking the datasheet for proper connections, specifically mentioning the need for a diode.
  • Another participant shares that they were able to get the circuit working after adding the diode and changing the MOSFET model to one from the library, indicating that the default model may not have been suitable.
  • This participant also notes that the LTC4440 is capable of driving a 1nF load with specific rise and fall times, as stated in the datasheet, and recommends extending the simulation time to observe steady-state behavior.
  • Concerns are raised about potential unexpected behavior in the simulation depending on load resistance and MOSFET model used.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the issues faced with the LTC4440 simulation, as participants present differing views on the circuit configuration and component selection. Multiple competing approaches to resolving the simulation problems are discussed.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential missing assumptions regarding circuit connections and component models, as well as unresolved questions about the simulation parameters and their impact on results.

MattQ
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Am I trying to use the LTC4440 as a high side mosfet driver, but when I run the demo simulation in LTSPice, this is what I get from the output from TG. There seems to be no boost to the gate control, so how can this drive any MOSFET, much less a FET with a drain voltage of 70 as specified on the spec sheet?

Included the schematic
 

Attachments

  • LTC4440.jpg
    LTC4440.jpg
    19.3 KB · Views: 849
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
MattQ said:
[..] when I run the demo simulation in LTSPice, this is what I get from the output from TG.
Did you forget the attachment?
 
MattQ said:
Am I trying to use the LTC4440 as a high side mosfet driver, but when I run the demo simulation in LTSPice, this is what I get from the output from TG. There seems to be no boost to the gate control, so how can this drive any MOSFET, much less a FET with a drain voltage of 70 as specified on the spec sheet?

Included the schematic

Thanks for adding the attachment. You have not connected the Boost section correctly. You are missing at least a diode... Check the datasheet again for the 4440.
 
I got your circuit working only after adding the diode (as advised by the datasheet) and changing the mosfet model from the default "NMOS" to an actual model from the library (I arbitrarily picked BSH114). I suspect this might have something to do with this quote from the datasheet:
LTC4440 DATASHEET said:
The LTC4440 is capable of driving a 1nF load with 10ns rise and 7ns fall times using a bootstrapped supply voltage VBOOST–TS of 12V

You should probably also extend the simulation time as well and make sure it behaves as you want in the steady state region—for some combinations of load resistance and mosfet model I saw some weird things happen after a while. Good luck.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
80
Views
5K