Luanch angle to put a satellite in an orbit?

AI Thread Summary
To successfully launch a satellite into a 1000 km orbit, the launch angle must balance vertical ascent to clear the atmosphere and horizontal velocity to achieve orbit. A nearly horizontal launch is not feasible due to insufficient altitude gain, while a vertical launch does not provide the necessary horizontal speed. The ideal launch angle is around 78 degrees, but practical considerations, such as the weight of the vehicle, necessitate a vertical launch followed by a gravity turn to achieve the correct trajectory. Satellites are typically not launched directly into their final orbit; instead, they first reach a low Earth orbit before transferring to the desired altitude in multiple stages. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for effective satellite deployment.
smhni
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a Question:

suppose we have a satellite (m=400kg, V0=40m/s) and we want to put it in a 1000km orbit (r=1000km)...what should be the launch angle?


P.S: is this question complete?(For Lack Of A Better Word) .. I mean do we have a formula which relates these parameters.. or perhaps a couple of formulas that relates them...


thx for you help...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The main goal is to increase speed, so the best path would be nearly horizontal, except that atmospheric drag is much less at higher altitudes, so there needs to be a significant veritcal component during the early part of the path until the atmosphere gets thinner, reducing drag force (along with heat) on the rocket as it's speed increases. Once past the atmosphere, then something similar to a Hohmann transfer orbital path is used, depending on the weight of the target object:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hohmann_transfer_orbit
 
smhni said:
P.S: is this question complete?(For Lack Of A Better Word) .. I mean do we have a formula which relates these parameters.. or perhaps a couple of formulas that relates them...

The question is not complete, and not by a long shot. The ideal launch angle is neither vertical nor horizontal. A horizontal launch won't gain the altitude needed to clear the atmosphere. A vertical launch isn't aligned to gain the requisite horizontal velocity. For the Space Shuttle, the ideal launch angle would be about 78º rather the the 90º vertical alignment.

The Shuttle is not launched at a 78º pitch angle for the simple reason that the vehicle is too danged heavy to be launched at any angle but vertical. It would fall over before it could ever be launched were it oriented at 78º. Vertically-launched vehicles such as the Shuttle have to pitch down to the desired angle soon after launch. Once in this desired attitude, the vehicle maintains a zero angle of attack and follows a gravity turn (google this phrase). The gravity turn let's gravity and aerodynamics turn the vehicle so that by the time the vehicle leaves the atmosphere it is oriented nearly horizontally and has attained orbital velocity.

Vehicles are not launch directly into a 1000 km orbit. The launch vehicle takes the spacecraft to a very low Earth orbit. From that point, upper stages transfer the spacecraft from this insertion orbit to the desired orbit. This is typically done in multiple steps so as to insure that not only is the vehicle in the desired orbit but is also in the right place on that orbit.
 
thanks guys... your answers were very helpful..
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top