Lyman alpha forest different for different objects?

AI Thread Summary
The distribution of Lyman alpha absorbers in quasar spectra varies with redshift, indicating an evolutionary trend in the universe. Research suggests that the frequency of these absorbers follows a power law, but the constants differ among various astronomical objects. This discrepancy raises questions about the expected uniformity of absorber distribution across different directions in the universe. The user seeks recent references on this topic, noting a scarcity of studies post-2001. Understanding these variations is crucial for interpreting cosmic structures and their evolution.
Jonathan Scott
Gold Member
Messages
2,344
Reaction score
1,184
I was wondering how the distribution of Lyman alpha absorbers (as seen in the "forest" of absorption lines of a quasar spectrum) varies with red-shift (corresponding to evolution with the age of the universe). I've found various sources which mention in passing that the frequency of absorbers in a given spectrum vary with redshift according to a power law, which sounds interesting.

But it seems that the constants involved and hence the redshift distribution of absorption systems varies for different objects. Is that really right, and if so how can that be? I had expected that the average number of clouds between two given redshift values would be about the same in all directions, so all objects should show similar distributions.

Can anyone point me to a recent reference on this? Most of the papers I can find are around 1997-2001.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top