Lightspeed5 said:
Hi all,
The way I understand it is that temperature is a measure of the random kinetic of molecules and atoms.
When you heat something up, eventually it will start to emit visible light once it gets hot enough. When a macroscopic object is moving through a vacuum however, why does it not glow like a heated object does, even if moving at high speeds?
Welcome to PF, Lightspeed5 – Yours is a simple question with a not-so-simple answer—which is probably why you haven’t seen too many responses.
1. First of all, the parameter “temperature” means different things under different circumstances.
2. For ideal gases under conditions of equilibrium, the gas temperature measures the kinetic energy of translation along a single axis of movement—the axis that is normal to the sensing surface.
3. Keep in mind that “measurement” always involves the characteristic being measured, the device doing the measurement, and the observer observing that device.
4. When a conductive thermometer measures the temperature of a gas, what it actually measures is the mean magnitude of the kinetic energy of the “impulse” transferred to the sensing surface of the thermometer by the impacts of the gas molecules upon that surface. It does not directly measure the speed of the molecules.
5. The same thing is true when molecules impact upon one another in their random translatory motions. Their reactions to these impacts are reactions to the kinetic energies involved, not simply to the individual speeds at the instant of impact.
6. It is the mean magnitude of these intermolecular impacts that influences the nature of the photons subsequently emitted by the gas molecules.
7. The “temperature” of a macroscopic object traveling through space is unrelated to its speed through space, but is a function of its internal kinetic energies.
8. I hope this answers your question.