I Macroscopic objects in free-fall

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of macroscopic objects in free-fall, particularly regarding internal electromagnetic forces and their impact on the object's center of mass (COM). It is established that while individual constituents may experience non-geodesic paths due to these internal forces, the overall motion of the object's COM remains geodesic in a gravitational field. The conversation also touches on the concept of "center of mass" versus "center of energy," especially in systems involving massless particles like light. Tidal effects are discussed, noting that significant curvature can alter the shape and behavior of objects, yet the COM still follows a geodesic path. Ultimately, the interplay between internal forces and gravitational effects is clarified, emphasizing that the COM's trajectory is unaffected by internal dynamics during free-fall.
  • #31
PeterDonis said:
But if the tidal effects are non-negligible, those non-geodesic paths will still result in a shape of the body that is different from what its shape would have been in flat spacetime in the absence of any geodesic deviation (i.e., spacetime curvature).
However, as you highlighted before, even in this case the body's COM continues to follow a geodesic path in free-fall.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
cianfa72 said:
as you highlighted before, even in this case the body's COM continues to follow a geodesic path in free-fall.
Yes.
 

Similar threads

Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
5K