Magnet Coil Turns and wire calculation

AI Thread Summary
To create an effective homemade electromagnet, it's crucial to balance wire gauge and coil turns based on voltage and resistance. The discussion emphasizes using the formula I=V/R to calculate current and highlights that reducing the number of turns increases current without enhancing magnetic force. A reference to wire gauge tables is provided for selecting appropriate copper wire sizes. The importance of understanding basic electronic principles is stressed, particularly when dealing with high voltage sources. Overall, maintaining the right number of turns is essential for efficiency and performance in electromagnet design.
bhavu21fri
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello Friends

I am working on home made electromagnet and I have only volt & Ohms details like 12Volt DC, 24Volt DC & 240V AC and ohms is 80Ω, 100Ω & 120Ω for all for example 12VDC 80 ohms coil, 12VDC 100ohms,24VDC 80Ohms coil...etc.

now i want to know which copper gauge we have to choose to create that magnet coil and how many turns i have to take for proper magnet..

is there any equation to calculate to choose...wire and turns
I want to also know the ampere capacity of that magnet coil.


Thanks you very much..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think a warning needs to be said here, because from the sounds of your post you're considering attaching a copper wire to the mains power without a good understanding of the basic electronic circuit elements...

be careful!
 
Dear thank you for your replay i don't have much knowledge for the magnet coil

I want to know how to calculate if you tell me in detail with example ...Thanks to All,

I also got some example on below...may be it will help us dear

For DC, we may be able to do some simplified experiments to give us some interesting results.

So let's say you have a 10 ohm, 600 turn coil. For DC, we'll simplify the current as a resistive calculation of I=V/R = 50/10 = 5 amps.

Call this COIL 1: i=5,N=600,A=1,g=.5 (A and g explained below)

Now remove 100 turns, let's assume the resistance is reduced linearly. 500/600 * 10 Ohms = 8 1/3 Ohms, and I = 50/8.33 = 6 amps

So COIL 2: i=6,N=500,A=1,g=.5

Here's where it gets interesting. Go to this site for a simplified estimation of the coil force, and plug in both sets of numbers, and compare the resulting coil force for each coil. The A and g terms are related to the geometry of the coil, and you can use appropriate values for a pinball coil.

http://www.daycounter.com/Calculators/Magnets/Solenoid-Force-Calculator.phtml

You'll find that the force is identical for both coils. So by removing winds, we're increasing the current needed to produce the *same* force. CURRENT GOES UP, WINDINGS GO DOWN, FORCE STAYS THE SAME!

Essentially, we are making the coil LESS EFFICIENT by removing winds, and achieving no gain in force.

The real case may differ from this simplified version somewhat, but this experiment shows that removing windings is a bad idea. We're only increasing the amount of current the coil is going to use, increasing the stress on the driver circuit, and getting no gain in force.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top