Magnetic charge,matter and anti matter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of differentiating matter and antimatter based on electric charge and questions whether magnetic charge could also create a similar distinction. It suggests that if magnetic charge exists, it might lead to a form of matter and antimatter based on magnetic properties. The conversation highlights that the definition of antiparticles is not solely dependent on charge but involves matching creation and annihilation operators in quantum field theory. Additionally, it posits that a magnetic charge moving forward in time should be indistinguishable from one moving backward. The inquiry remains speculative, hinging on the existence of magnetic charge itself.
spidey
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
I got a thought on this strange hypothetical question. We differentiate between matter and anti matter based on electric charge. if electron has -ve charge,then its anti matter positron has +ve charge. Supposing if there are particles having magnetic charge then

1. Will we have matter and anti matter based on magnetic charge also?
If the above question has positive answer then,
2. How they are different from matter and anti matter based on electric charge?
3. what will happen if matter and anti matter based on magnetic charge meets?
3. what will happen if the combination of matter and antimatter based on electric and magnetic charge meets?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi spidey! :smile:

Anti-ness isn't based on one specific quality (such as charge) …

the anti-particle of any particular particle is defined so that the creation operator of the particle "matches" the annihilation operator of the anti-particle (and vice-versa) …

so (in qft field definitions and particularly in Feynman diagrams) a particle going forward in time is indistinguishable form its anti-particle going backward in time.

So all you need to do is to work out what a magnetic charge going backward in time would look like (if you thought it was going forward). :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi spidey! :smile:

Anti-ness isn't based on one specific quality (such as charge) …

the anti-particle of any particular particle is defined so that the creation operator of the particle "matches" the annihilation operator of the anti-particle (and vice-versa) …

so (in qft field definitions and particularly in Feynman diagrams) a particle going forward in time is indistinguishable form its anti-particle going backward in time.

So all you need to do is to work out what a magnetic charge going backward in time would look like (if you thought it was going forward). :wink:

Thanks Tiny tim..

I thought only electric charge differentiates between matter and anti matter. I even don't know how magnetic charge going forward would look like. But, by symmetry, magnetic charge going forward in time should also be indistinguishable from magnetic charge going backward in time. my question has no meaning unless there exist magnetic charge.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top