Magnetic compass and Earth's magnetic field

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a magnetic compass in relation to Earth's magnetic field, exploring concepts such as the alignment of the compass needle, the definition of magnetic meridians, and the implications of Earth's magnetic poles. The scope includes theoretical aspects of magnetism, conceptual clarifications, and some experimental references.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the compass needle aligns itself parallel to the horizontal component of Earth's magnetic field when placed on the surface.
  • Others argue that a magnetic needle suspended in a solution would orient itself parallel to the actual Earth's field lines, with the needle at the North Pole pointing upward.
  • There is a discussion about whether the compass needle always lies in the magnetic meridian, with some participants agreeing but noting that "meridian" refers to circles through Earth's rotational poles, which differ from magnetic ones near the poles.
  • One participant recalls a special compass used to measure the angle of dip, suggesting its relevance to geologists interested in Earth's magnetism and mineral deposits.
  • Another participant mentions a personal experiment involving the breakdown of Earth's magnetic field into components, indicating practical applications of understanding these concepts.
  • A later post introduces a perspective on the magnetic poles, stating that the magnetic north pole is actually a magnetic south pole, leading to a discussion on the nature of magnetic attraction and the implications of potential future magnetic reversals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express both agreement and disagreement on various points, particularly regarding the definitions and implications of magnetic meridians and the nature of Earth's magnetic poles. Multiple competing views remain, and the discussion does not reach a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on definitions of magnetic terms and the unresolved nature of certain claims about magnetic pole characteristics and compass behavior.

Vibhor
Messages
971
Reaction score
40
Hello ,

I am having a slight confusion while reading the chapter on Earth's magnetism . If we place a magnetic compass on the floor I.e on Earth's surface , the North (red) of the compass needle points towards magnetic north of Earth .

But would it be correct to say that "the compass needle aligns itself such that it becomes parallel to the horizontal component of Earth's magnetic field " ??

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's true, but it's of course simply because compasses are constrained to horizontal movement. If you had say a magnetic needle suspended in a solution, it would orient itself parallel to the actual Earth's field lines. At th the North Pole the needle would be pointing upward.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor and cnh1995
Ok.

And the compass needle always lies in the magnetic meridian ??

In other words it is always possible to draw a plane that passes through the compass needle and the magnetic axis of Earth .This plane is called the magnetic meridian at the point of location of compass .

Is it correct ?
 
rumborak said:
That's true, but it's of course simply because compasses are constrained to horizontal movement. If you had say a magnetic needle suspended in a solution, it would orient itself parallel to the actual Earth's field lines. At th the North Pole the needle would be pointing upward.
I think the N pole of the magnet seeks the N magnetic pole of Earth, which is underground, so the compass needle you describe would point down when placed over the North Magnetic Pole.
 
Vibhor said:
And the compass needle always lies in the magnetic meridian ??

A ... qualified yes. That is, "meridian" is the term for the circles that go through Earth's *rotational* poles, not the magnetic ones. Those differ when you get close enough to the poles.
In a less strict sense your statement is correct though.

In other words it is always possible to draw a plane that passes through the compass needle and the magnetic axis of Earth .This plane is called the magnetic meridian at the point of location of compass .

Same qualified yes. It's a simple geometric consequence that the two will share the same plane. After all, that's what "aligning" means.
 
rumborak said:
... because compasses are constrained to horizontal movement. If you had say a magnetic needle suspended in a solution, it would orient itself parallel to the actual Earth's field lines...
I remember we had at school a special compass mounted in a vertical plane, which was used to measure "the angle of dip" , I suppose the vertical component of the Earth's field.
I can't remember any use for knowing this! So I looked in WikiP, but they don't seem to know any reason to measure this angle either. My guess is it's mainly of interest to geologists - either interested in the Earth's magnetism, movement of the poles and what have you, or looking for magnetic anomalies to indicate mineral deposits etc.
 
Merlin3189 said:
I remember we had at school a special compass mounted in a vertical plane, which was used to measure "the angle of dip" , I suppose the vertical component of the Earth's field.
I can't remember any use for knowing this! So I looked in WikiP, but they don't seem to know any reason to measure this angle either. My guess is it's mainly of interest to geologists - either interested in the Earth's magnetism, movement of the poles and what have you, or looking for magnetic anomalies to indicate mineral deposits etc.
A use for knowing this?
Breaking down the Earth's magnetic field into its x, y, and z components was the only way I was able to complete an experiment a few years back.

This post shows the basic setup, but the results were all wrong.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-does-ammeter-work.779075/#post-4900375

From a later post; "I'm still trying to figure out why, when I'm told that the Earth's flux is ≈0.54 gauss where I live, I come up with a smaller number [0.33 gauss]."

Here, knowing I only needed one of the components, I concluded the experiment with a reading of 0.43 gauss, which was close enough to the 0.49 gauss it was supposed to be.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-does-ammeter-work.779075/page-2#post-4906555

Anyways, that's one use.

------
ps. I would link to the thread in general, but we went so far off topic, it was embarrassing. And we never did figure out how a 'clip on' ammeter works! Though, it was fun trying.
 
:rolleyes:
tech99 said:
I think the N pole of the magnet seeks the N magnetic pole of Earth, which is underground, so the compass needle you describe would point down when placed over the North Magnetic Pole.

other way around, opposites attract, similar repels

but it is a bit more complicated than that
what we call the magnetic north pole on the Earth is actually magnetic south pole polarised
and the magnetic south pole ( off Antarctica) is magnetic north pole polarised

why you ask ?

The magnetic poles are defined by which end of the magnet that the field lines emerge and re-enter the magnet. Field lines emerge from the north pole and re-enter at the south pole

220px-VFPt_cylindrical_magnet_thumb.svg.png


the Earth's magnetic field is thus ...

earth_magnetic_field_poles.jpg


so as can be seen the magnetic polarities are opposite to what is expected

A bar magnet or compass needle 's N pole end seeks out the magnetic south pole
(opposites attract) which currently happens to be up in the geographic north of the northern hemisphere

Another magnetic reversal of the Earth's field at some time in the future ( as has happened often in the past) will restore the normal. but then all the red end of compass needles will indicate the other way :wink: :rolleyes:
Dave
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
22K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
19K