Magnetic confinement field range

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential effects of using a kilo Tesla magnetic field in magnetic confinement fusion. Participants explore whether such strong fields could address existing challenges in plasma confinement, stability, and reaction rates, while considering the implications for system operations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a stable kilo Tesla magnetic field could increase plasma lifetime and reaction cross section, although they acknowledge current limitations in stability.
  • Another participant notes that while superconducting magnets can produce fields of 10-15 T in steady-state, kilo Tesla fields are typically generated explosively and are not stable, raising concerns about material limitations to contain such pressures.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that while confinement might not directly affect the reaction cross section, higher plasma density could increase the reaction rate, and the lifetime of the plasma might improve under high pressure.
  • One participant raises the possibility of using a lower primary magnetic field for heating plasma, followed by a pulsed kilo Tesla field to induce fusion, questioning whether magnetic insulation could mitigate negative effects on other system operations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and implications of using kilo Tesla magnetic fields in fusion, with no consensus reached on the practicality or effectiveness of the proposed approaches.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential limitations related to material strength and the interaction of strong magnetic fields with other operational components, but do not resolve these issues.

Who May Find This Useful

Researchers and practitioners in the fields of plasma physics, fusion energy, and magnetic confinement systems may find this discussion relevant.

Relena
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
How would using a kilo Tesla magnetic field (quite strong I know) affect magnetic confinement fusion.

can this overcome main difficulties ?

I think if the field was stable for enough time this would increase plasma lifetime and the reaction cross section .

I know that a kilo Tesla pulsed field was generated using destructive coils but it's not stable enough, but I hope higher stability will be achieved..

Any thoughts ...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I believe the strongest superconducting magnets produce fields of about 10-15 T in steady-state, but certainly stronger fields can be produced explosively, but that means short term transients.

Also realize that the pressure of a magnetically confined plasma is proportional to B2 - so if one does a magnetic field of say 1 kTesla, try to determine the pressure, then determined the stress in the magnetic or containment vessel necessary to hold that pressure. I don't believe there is a material strong enough - or one would require substantial mass/cross section.
 
The reaction cross section is a function of kinetic energy of the particles, so confinement won't affect it, but the reaction rate will increase if the density is higher. Lifetime should increase as well, since a plasma under that much pressure shouldn't lose energy to its surroundings.

But you have to take into account how this field will affect other operations, like the magnetic field used for ohmic heating, or the flow of coolant in the shielding and blanket. What might be good for the plasma might be bad for the rest of the system.
 
Ok then , Isn't there any way to use a low (primary) field for heating plasma then,
inducing the pulsed kilo Tesla field to cause fusion?

I think if the magnetic field was insulated well (magnetic screens , etc..) this may not affect other operations , or am I mistaken?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K