Magnetic field directionality, mathematic rigmarole?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the direction of magnetic fields and the forces exerted on moving charged particles. It highlights that the force experienced by a charged particle in a magnetic field is always perpendicular to both the velocity of the particle and the magnetic field itself, as described by the equation F.b=q(vXB). The question raised is whether the directionality of the magnetic field is merely a definitional construct or if it has a tangible basis in reality that can be experimentally validated. It is noted that the magnitude and direction of the magnetic force depend on the particle's speed and trajectory, leading to different forces for particles moving through the same point in different directions. Consequently, a unique magnetic field cannot be defined at a point that aligns with the magnetic force experienced by the particle.
Phyzwizz
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
The force as a result of a moving charged particle through a magnetic field is perpendicular to the field apparently. Why should the magnetic field be perpendicular to the force created as a result. F.b=q(vXB) is the mathematical notation for this which accurately describes the world. But I cannot imagine why it would be impossible for math to describe the magnetic force instead in terms of a magnetic field that is parallel with it. So is the directionality of the magnetic field, simply just assigned by definition, or does it have some basis in reality that can actually be proven by experiment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both the magnitude and direction of the magnetic force on a particle moving through a particular point in space (with a given surrounding arrangement of currents and/or moving charges) depend on the particle's speed and direction of motion. Two particles going through the same point with the same speed but in different directions, experience magnetic forces that (in general) have different magnitudes and directions. Therefore one cannot define a unique magnetic field at that point that has the same direction as the magnetic force.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top