Magnetic field - General current in a cube

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the magnetic field generated by a general current flowing through a cube, with specific focus on the implications of current density and path. Participants explore the relationship between current flow and magnetic field characteristics within a three-dimensional geometric context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need for more information regarding the current density and its path, questioning whether it is straight or varies in some way. There are attempts to relate the problem to symmetry and current distribution along the edges of the cube.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing differing opinions on whether the magnetic field can be assumed to be zero at the center of the cube. Some suggest that the entry and exit points of the current, as well as which edges are active, play a crucial role in determining the magnetic field. There is also mention of considering the edges as resistances to aid in understanding current distribution.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of specific details about the current density and its spatial variation, which participants note as a significant factor in analyzing the problem. The original poster has basic knowledge of calculus and vectors but indicates limited familiarity with vector calculus.

pieuler
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Given a cube carrying current, such that the current enters and leaves the cube at any two arbitrary points, prove that the magnetic field at the centre of the cube will always be 0.
Relevant Equations
Biot Savart Law
Ampere Circuit law
I could solve a similar (rather, a specific case of the above) where the current entered through a
corner and left from the corner opposite to it along the body diagonal of the cube. For this specific case, I was able to easily exploit symmetry to deduce the answer (0). However, I cannot think of any suitable technique (eg. symmetry) for the general version.

PS. I have basic knowledge of calculus and vectors, but not so much of 'vector calculus'. Any intuitive guidance/hints/solutions are appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think we need to know more information about the given current density. Saying that it just enters at one point and exits at another point is not enough. We need to know what is the in between path (is it a straight line? it is some sort of helix? or what else, they can be infinite ways for the inbetween path) and how the current density varies spatially in this path.

If you have some image or figure you can post here please do it, many times one picture worth thousands of words.

I don't think we can prove that the magnetic field at the center will always be zero, regardless of the details of the current density.
 
Current is constant and uniform. No specific details about current/current density were given so I believe it's supposed to be constant and uniform(like no variations whatsoever). Current flows along the edges only.

IMG_2890.jpg

Basically, any two completely random points on the edges of the cube. The setup is like a cubical cage made of wires. So that tells you that the current flows only along the edges.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
I still don't see how it would be possible to prove that the magnetic field would be zero at the center, my opinion is that it depends on the entry point, on the exit point and which edges (or parts of edges) are "active" that is they carry the current.
 
Delta2 said:
I still don't see how it would be possible to prove that the magnetic field would be zero at the center, my opinion is that it depends on the entry point, on the exit point and which edges (or parts of edges) are "active" that is they carry the current.
How about we consider the edges to be resistances (equal of course) and then think about the current distribution? That is one way of doing the specific case I mentioned, so it might help in the general case too.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K