Magnetic Field required to hold a loop in static equilibrium

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a square loop with a mass of 4.0 kg and a side length of 4.5 m, tilted at a 25-degree angle, with a current of 25 A flowing through it. The objective is to determine the strength of a uniform horizontal magnetic field required to maintain the loop in static equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the forces acting on the loop, including gravitational and magnetic forces. There are suggestions to analyze the problem from a mechanics perspective, considering hypothetical forces needed for equilibrium. Questions arise about the contributions of different sides of the loop and the need for a body diagram to visualize forces and torques.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various approaches being explored. Some participants suggest focusing on mechanics first before integrating the magnetic field into the analysis. There is recognition of the complexity introduced by the magnetic moment and torque, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering the weight of all sides of the loop and question the relevance of the side resting on the ground. There is an acknowledgment of the need for clarity regarding the configuration of the loop and the forces acting on it.

mmest
Messages
1
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



There is a square loop with mass of 4.0 kg and side length 4.5 m that is tilted upwards from the ground at a 25 degree angle with one side resting on the surface. The loop is a conductor that has 25 A of current going through it. The question asks to find the strength a uniform horizontal magnetic field to keep the loop in static equilibrium in that position.

Homework Equations



F = IL x B
F
= qv X B

The Attempt at a Solution



F[/B] = IL x B = ILBsin(theta)
B = F/(25A*4.5m*sin(25 degrees)
I tried solving for B by getting force as equal to mg = 4 kg * 9.8 m/s^2, but the resulting B is incorrect. Where did I mess up?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
mmest said:
with one side resting on the surface

Hello mmest, :welcome: !
 
Seems @BvU net/power went down while he was writing the message...

My advice would be to forget temporarily about the magnetic field, and view this as a pure mechanics problem. What hypothetical force (in magnitude and direction) and at which side of the square ,must be applied in order to keep the square loop at static equilibrium?

Once you solve the mechanics problem and find this hypothetical force, i believe you ll find easily the magnetic field that is required to have this force applied by the magnetic field.

On second thought you can't forget the magnetic field completely, given that it is horizontal (and if the general configuration is as I think it is, you should provide a schematic to be 100% sure)that should give you a hint on which side and at what direction the hypothetical force should be.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
Remember that you have to account for the weight of all three sides. Does the fourth (ground) side matter at all?
Does the B field exert any force on the two upward-pointing sides? Does gravity?
You need to draw a body diagram of the loop and the forces applied to it, and the ensuing torques.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
It's probably more direct to balance the gravitational torque against the magnetic torque ##\vec \mu \times\vec B## where ##\vec \mu~##is the loop's magnetic moment.
 
kuruman said:
It's probably more direct to balance the gravitational torque against the magnetic torque ##\vec \mu \times\vec B## where ##\vec \mu~##is the loop's magnetic moment.
Yeah, but magnetic moment is somewhat of an advanced concept, at least compared to F = mg and F = iL x B.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K