Magnetic Field Theory Contradiction? - Repost

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a perceived contradiction between the Left-Hand Rule (LHR) for motors and the Right-Hand Rule (RHR) for generators regarding the direction of force on charges in a magnetic field. The LHR uses a negative charge (electron) while the RHR uses a positive charge, leading to confusion about the direction of force when both rules are applied. It is clarified that the direction of electric current is traditionally defined as the flow of positive charges, despite actual electron movement being in the opposite direction. This historical convention explains why both rules yield equivalent results, as the magnetic force on a positive charge moving in one direction is the same as that on a negative charge moving in the opposite direction. The discussion concludes that understanding this convention resolves the initial confusion.
magnetismman
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I've been thinking about Magnetic Fields, and I think that I've found a contradiction in conventional physics theory.

While comparing the Left-Hand-Rule for Motors (LHR) and the Right-Hand-Rule for Generators (RHR), I found this contradiction:

The Left-Hand-Rule states that if the Magnetic Field (B) is on the y-axis, and the Velocity of a Current (I) is on the x-axis; Then the Force acts in the z-axis up. This uses a negative charge (an electron).

The Right-Hand-Rule states that if the Magnetic Field (B) is on the y-axis, and the Velocity of a Test Charge (v) is on the x-axis; Then the Force acts in the z-axis up. This uses a positive charge.

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=68407&d=1396915312

Put another way, if both use a negative-charge as an example:
The Left-Hand-Rule states the electron moving along the x-axis would have a Force-Up.
The Right-Hand-Rule states the electron moving along the x-axis would have a Force-Down (Due to the negative-charge).

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=68408&d=1396915312

Can anyone tell me why equal charges, with equal directions, would have opposite forces?

Is one of my sources flawed? Is this simply due to fact that one rule is for motors and one for generators? Is there some context I haven't considered?

Sources:
Wikipedia - 'Fleming's left-hand rule for motors'
Cutnell & Johnson – Physics – Sixth Edition – ISBN 0-471-15183-1 (page 624)

Thank you for your advice, and I'll be glad if anyone can explain this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
magnetismman said:
The Left-Hand-Rule states that if the Magnetic Field (B) is on the y-axis, and the Velocity of a Current (I) is on the x-axis; Then the Force acts in the z-axis up. This uses a negative charge (an electron).

Where do you get that this uses a negative charge?

Sources:
Wikipedia - 'Fleming's left-hand rule for motors'

On http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fleming's_left-hand_rule_for_motors I see in the section "Conventions":

The direction of the electric current is that of conventional current: from positive to negative.

That is, the charge-carriers are assumed to be positively charged.
 
jtbell said:
That is, the charge-carriers are assumed to be positively charged.

Thank you for the response. So, am I to understand that even thought 'I' delivers a negative charge, it is defined by the positive-potential that attracts that negative-charge? ...or am I incorrect in my concept of 'I'? Thanks again.
 
The magnetic force exerted on a positive charge moving in the +x direction is the same as on a negative charge moving in the -x direction. Likewise the magnetic field produced by a current of positive charges moving in the +x direction is the same as for a current of negative charges moving in the -x direction.

For historical reasons, when we talk about the direction of electric current, we generally mean the direction of positive-charge flow that would produce that current, even though we know it's really a flow of negative charges in the opposite direction.
 
jtbell said:
For historical reasons, when we talk about the direction of electric current, we generally mean the direction of positive-charge flow that would produce that current, even though we know it's really a flow of negative charges in the opposite direction.

Thanks again. That makes a lot more sense now. This graphic might sum it up well for others reading the post:

500px-Current_notation.svg.png


I appreciate the advice.
 
Answer after Confusion

Since an Electrical Current is a Positive-Flow,
the two rules are equivalent:

attachment.php?attachmentid=68445&stc=1&d=1396990991.jpg
 

Attachments

  • ANSWER.jpg
    ANSWER.jpg
    23.3 KB · Views: 1,691
Back
Top