Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Magnetic Field using Ampere's Law

  1. Dec 25, 2014 #1
    I find Ampere's Circuital Law sort of fishy. I don't understand what the actual theory proposes. And the loop that should be taken into consideration adds much to the confusion. How should we select the loop?

    And in the case of a long wire we find the magnetic field around it by applying ##B.2\pi r= \mu_o i_{enc}##. So how do we find the magnetic field due to a short wire (which is not long or infinitely long)?
    Using Biot Savart Law we find the magnetic field due to a short wire as ##\mu_o/4\pi r (cos\theta_1-cos\theta_2)##
    where ##cos\theta_1## and ##cos\theta_2## are the angles between the length vector (towards the direction of current) and the position vector at the extreme ends.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 25, 2014 #2
    Yes, using Biot-Savart Law is a way to go here. About integration procedures for particular examples ask in math calculus section.
     
  4. Dec 25, 2014 #3

    jim hardy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    Fishy ?

    As a kid did you never tinker with iron filings and a battery?

    Ampere allows one to put a number on this phenomenon...
    ironfilingsaroundwire.jpg
    http://coe.kean.edu/~afonarev/Physics/Magnetism/Magnetic Fields and Forces-eL.htm

    There's no overwhelming reason to chose any particular closed loop path in air
    so i'd pick one that makes for a not-very-cumbersome integral

    but in solving a practical problem like a transformer ,,

    Two%20solenoids,%20B-field_5H15.40_JPG.jpg
    https://sharepoint.umich.edu/lsa/physics/demolab/SitePages/5H15.40 - Projection of the Magnetic Field Due to a Current in a Solenoid.aspx

    you'd probably find it handy to pick a path through the middle (or centroid) of its iron core.

    I guess using a clamp-on ammeter sorta made it intuitive for me...

    http://www.sears.com/craftsman-digital-clamp-on-ammeter/p-03482369000P
    http://c.shld.net/rpx/i/s/i/spin/image/spin_prod_1113787012?hei=444&wid=444&op_sharpen=1
     
  5. Dec 25, 2014 #4
    But I would like to know, why do we obtain the answer for a particular case (here, the magnetic field due to a long wire) using Ampere's Law. I mean if we are asked to find the magnetic field due to a short wire how do we do it? (I heard that Ampere's Law is the general rule for finding the magnetic field than the Biot-Savart Law)?
     
  6. Dec 25, 2014 #5
    To call Ampere's law "fishy" is a very bad choice of words. Ampere's Law and Biot-Savart Law are equivivalent in magnetostatics (meaning one can be derived from another). Which one do you choose to use depends on the problem's geometry. In your example of finitely long straight wire, Biot-Savart Law is more convinient to use.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook