Magnetic Fields- Finding the radius

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the radius of the path of a single ionized uranium ion in a magnetic field. The user initially attempted to use the formula m(v^2)/r = Bqv, but misinterpreted the variable "v" as the potential difference instead of the speed derived from it. The correct approach involves using energy conservation to find the speed from the potential difference of 4.4 x 10^5 V, leading to the accurate calculation of the radius, which is 4.14 m.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal force and magnetic force equations
  • Knowledge of energy conservation principles in physics
  • Familiarity with the concepts of potential difference and kinetic energy
  • Basic proficiency in algebra for rearranging equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to derive speed from potential difference using energy conservation principles
  • Study the relationship between magnetic fields and charged particle motion
  • Explore the derivation of the radius of curvature for charged particles in magnetic fields
  • Investigate the effects of different magnetic field strengths on particle trajectories
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators and anyone interested in the dynamics of charged particles in magnetic fields.

Studentphysics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A single ionized uranium ion of mass 6.9 x 10 ^-25 kg is accelerated through a potential difference of 4.4 x 10^5 V.
What is the radius of the path it would take if injected at 90 degrees into 0.47 T uniform magnetic field at this velocity?

3. Attempts

Since centripetal force is equal to magnetic force, I tried using the formula of m(v^2)/r = Bqv

By rearranging this, I was able to isolate for the radius mv/Bq = r

I used these values, in the the formula to find the radius
(4.4 x 10^5 V)(6.9 x 10 ^-25 kg) / (0.47T)(1.6 * 10^-19)

The answer I got was 4.037 m, however this is wrong because the real answer is 4.14m. I'm not sure what I am doing wrong, because the two values seem really close

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's probably a round off issue. How did you find v?
 
I used the potential difference of 4.4 x 10^5 V as my V
 
Studentphysics said:
I used the potential difference of 4.4 x 10^5 V as my V
That's a problem. The "v" in qvB and in mv2/r is a speed, not a potential difference. You need to find the speed from the potential difference. Hint: Use energy conservation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K