julianwitkowski
- 133
- 0
Oops now I forgot a bracket... F = 1.4 2 (4/sin(½√3) sin(½√3) = 11.2 N (down)
The discussion centers on calculating the magnetic force on a wire crossing a magnetic field of 1.4 T with a current of 2.0 A. The force is calculated using the equation F = iBLsinθ, yielding a force of 11.20 N directed downwards. The effects of rotating the wire, doubling the current, and reversing the magnetic field are analyzed, concluding that the force is proportional to the current and reverses direction when the magnetic field is reversed. Diagrams are emphasized as crucial for understanding the physical situation and the relationship between the wire, current, and magnetic field.
PREREQUISITESStudents of physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, electrical engineers, and educators seeking to enhance their understanding of magnetic forces on current-carrying wires.
!Oh boy, I wish I could turn back time here. ##{1\over 2}\sqrt 3## is the cosine of ##\pi\over 3## (= 60 degrees). (comes from half of an equlateral triangle, sides ##1, {1\over 2}, {1\over 2}\sqrt 3## ).In degrees... 4,6 m would be the length of the wire if L = 4/sin(60°) in deg... I don't understand why it is ½√3 in radians, because 60° = π/3... No? This is the edge of my understanding of radians, or lack of it.
If L = 4/sin(½√3) = 5.25 m, F = 1.4 2 (4/sin(½√3) sin(½√3) = 30.82 N (down)
I thought F = i B (w/sin θ) sin θ =1.4⋅2⋅(4/sin(π/3)) ⋅ sin (π/3) = 11.2 N (down)
So I'm confused... want to spoil this?
BvU said:Think you have it right, have to run.![]()
octave:9> sqrt(3)/2
ans = 0.86603
octave:10> pi/3
ans = 1.0472
octave:11> sin(pi/3)
ans = 0.86603
Simon Bridge said:If you make an equilateral trangle where the hypotenuse is 1 unit long and the adjacent side is 1/2 unit long, then the angle between these sides is pi/3 (60deg) and the length of the opposite side is the sine of the angle. In this set up you can find the length of the opposite side without using a calculator. Give it a go.
Simon Bridge said:However, ##\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} = 49.6^\circ## ... is nonsense.