Magnetic length of a bar magnet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of magnetic length versus geometrical length in bar magnets, particularly in the context of magnetic monopoles. It explains that while monopoles can be conceptually placed at the ends of a magnet for distant field calculations, this assumption fails for close-range fields due to their complexity. The magnetic field lines near the magnet are intricate and cannot be accurately represented by two monopoles alone. Visual aids from reputable sources are suggested to clarify the magnetic field patterns. Understanding these nuances is essential for grasping magneto statics effectively.
phymathlover
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
We just started magneto statics in school and were told about the use of magnetic monopoles for problem-solving reasons. So we were told that the magnetic length of a bar magnet differs from its geometrical length. I can't quite seem to figure out why we can't assume the monopoles to be right at the ends of the magnet. I do know that a bar magnet can be compared to a long solenoid but we haven't yet studied about either of them in detail and I suffer epic fails whenever I try to get ahead of the class. So a detailed explanation would be really helpful, thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't quite seem to figure out why we can't assume the monopoles to be right at the ends of the magnet.
For the field far away from the magnet, you can. You just have to adjust the strength of those virtual monopoles to the distance between them.
For the field close to the magnet, this is not possible, the field is more complicated.
 
Could you possibly give me a picture or something of the magnetic fields at the end. So that's the reason then? That the magnetic field lines are complicated? I'm still really confused, a little more detail would be really helpful
 
BBC has a good image http://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/ks3/science/energy_electricity_forces/magnets_electric_effects/revision/3/. You don't get that field with two monopoles.
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top