Magnetism & Inertia: Can Objects Orbit Each Other?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter litewk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia Magnets
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the possibility of two objects with similar size, mass, and magnetic field strength forming orbits around a common center of magnetism, balancing inertia with magnetism. It examines the implications of such interactions within the framework of classical and quantum physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if two mutually magnetic objects can orbit around a common center of magnetism at a given distance scale, suggesting a relationship between the four fundamental forces and orbital time period ratios.
  • Another participant argues that while central attractive forces like gravity can lead to stable orbits, the electromagnetic force is not central when motion is involved, complicating the formation of stable orbits between magnetic objects.
  • A different participant challenges the assertion that all central force orbits are stable, referencing Bertrand's theorem and noting that the magnetic attraction does not follow an inverse-square law.
  • One participant suggests that if a rotational impulse is provided, the objects could maintain their orbit, but without it, they would not be able to do so.
  • Another participant mentions that the pair of objects would have a time-varying dipole moment, leading to the radiation of electromagnetic waves, which would result in energy and angular momentum loss, ultimately causing collapse.
  • One participant clarifies that while a central force is necessary for stable orbits, it is not sufficient, and discusses the complexities of magnetic forces in practical scenarios.
  • Another participant agrees with the reference to the inverse-square law for idealized magnetic poles but cautions about the complications that arise with macroscopic objects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the stability of orbits formed by magnetic objects, with some asserting that stable orbits are not possible while others suggest conditions under which they might be achievable. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the nature of magnetic forces and their implications for orbital dynamics.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the attraction between magnets does not conform to simple laws like the inverse-square law, and that idealizations may not hold in practical scenarios, leading to complications in understanding the forces involved.

litewk
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Is it possible for two objects of nearly the exact same size, mass, and magnetic field strength to form something analogous to a curved space orbit in a relatively flat space by balancing inertia with magnetism? In other words, can two mutually magnetic objects orbit around a common center of magnetism for any length of time at some given distance scale?
If so, can all four fundamental forces of physics form six relationships via their orbital time period ratios. It seems like macro orbits have no meaning in the quantum world but this thought occurred to me a while back and I am non-degreed so I'm unable to solve this one easily.
Thanks for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any force that is central and attractive, like gravity, will lead to conservation of angular momentum, meaning that stable orbits are possible. The electrostatic force between two opposite charges is central and attractive, and the magnetostatic force between two ideal opposite magnetic poles is central and attractive, so you might think that electric charges or magnets could form stable orbits around each other. The problem is that orbits require motion, which mean we are no longer in statics. When motion is involved, the magnetic and electric field become coupled, and you enter the realm of electrodynamics. The electromagnetic (Lorentz) force is not central and therefore two electromagnetic objects cannot form a stable orbit with each other (classically speaking). This means classically that electrons should not form stable orbits around nuclei. This is the problem that lead to the need for a quantum description of atoms.
 
I disagree with chrisbaird. Not all central force orbits are stable. In fact, (Bertrand's theorem) only TWO types of orbits are stable: inverse-square law (gravity, electrostatics) and a radial harmonic oscillator type.

The attraction between two magnets is certainly NOT 1/r^2. I can't even remember what it is off the top of my head, but I remember trying to figure it out at some point and it was complicated... something like 1/r^3, or something similar.
 
litewk said:
In other words, can two mutually magnetic objects orbit around a common center of magnetism for any length of time at some given distance scale?

If there is a rotational impulse provided, yes(this prevents/slows the collapse). If not, no.
 
The pair of objects taken together will have a time-varying dipole moment. Therefore they will radiate electromagnetic waves, lose both energy and angular momentum and ultimately collapse.
 
DrFurious,

Thank you for clarifying. I did not mean to imply that a central force is a sufficient condition, just a necessary condition. Hence the word 'possible'.

Also, the attraction between two idealized point-like magnetic poles is an inverse square law, or similarly the force between two infinitesimal strips of current is an inverse square law. (See Jackson Eq. 5.10 for example.) Of course, idealizations like this are non-physical and when we go to actual macroscopic objects, the fields and forces get more complicated.

- Chris
 
chrisbaird said:
Also, the attraction between two idealized point-like magnetic poles is an inverse square law, or similarly the force between two infinitesimal strips of current is an inverse square law. (See Jackson Eq. 5.10 for example.) Of course, idealizations like this are non-physical and when we go to actual macroscopic objects, the fields and forces get more complicated.

Your reference is spot on. And the fields do get pretty complicated :)

Word to the wise though: if you have to do an experiment, don't rely on the magnetic result from (e.g. Jackson). Cause you will go crazy. Other non-dipole forces behave a lot easier.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K